Suppr超能文献

用于评估畏光症的平板应用验光计

Tablet App halometer for the assessment of dysphotopsia.

作者信息

Buckhurst Phillip J, Naroo Shehzad A, Davies Leon N, Shah Sunil, Buckhurst Hetal, Kingsnorth Alec, Drew Tom, Wolffsohn James S

机构信息

From the School of Health Professions (P.J. Buckhurst, H. Buckhurst), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom, Ophthalmic Research Group (Naroo, Davies, Shah, Kingsnorth, Drew, Wolffsohn), Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom, Midland Eye (Shah), Solihull, United Kingdom.

From the School of Health Professions (P.J. Buckhurst, H. Buckhurst), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom, Ophthalmic Research Group (Naroo, Davies, Shah, Kingsnorth, Drew, Wolffsohn), Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom, Midland Eye (Shah), Solihull, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Nov;41(11):2424-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.041.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the validity and repeatability of the Aston Halometer.

SETTING

University clinic, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Prospective, repeated-measures experimental study.

METHODS

The halometer comprises a bright light-emitting-diode (LED) glare source in the center of an iPad4. Letters subtending 0.21° (~0.3 logMAR) were moved centrifugally from the LED in 0.05 degree steps in 8 orientations separated by 45 degrees for each of 4 contrast levels (1000, 500, 100, and 25 Weber contrast units [Cw]) in random order. Bangerter occlusion foils were inserted in front of the right eye to simulate monocular glare conditions in 20 subjects (mean age 27.7 ± 3.1 years). Subjects were positioned 2 meters from the screen in a dark room with the iPad controlled from an iPhone via Bluetooth operated by the researcher. The C-Quant straylight meter was also used with each of the foils to measure the level of straylight over the retina. Halometry and straylight repeatability was assessed at a second visit.

RESULTS

Halo size increased with the different occlusion foils and target contrasts (F = 29.564, P < .001) as expected and in a pattern similar to straylight measures (F = 80.655, P < 0.001). Lower contrast letters showed better sensitivity but larger glare-obscured areas, resulting in ceiling effects caused by the screen's field-of-view, with 500 Cw being the best compromise. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of the Aston Halometer was good (500Cw: 0.84 to 0.93 and 0.53 to 0.73) and similar to the straylight meter.

CONCLUSION

The halometer provides a sensitive, repeatable way of quantifying a patient-recognized form of disability glare in multiple orientations to add objectivity to subjectively reported discomfort glare.

摘要

目的

评估阿斯顿眩光仪的有效性和可重复性。

地点

英国大学诊所。

设计

前瞻性重复测量实验研究。

方法

该眩光仪包括一个位于iPad4中央的明亮发光二极管(LED)眩光光源。对于4种对比度水平(1000、500、100和25韦伯对比度单位[Cw])中的每一种,在8个方向上以0.05度的步长从LED向外离心移动张角为0.21°(约0.3 logMAR)的字母,各方向间隔45度,顺序随机。在20名受试者(平均年龄27.7±3.1岁)的右眼前方插入邦格特遮挡箔片以模拟单眼眩光情况。受试者在暗室中距离屏幕2米,iPad由研究人员通过蓝牙从iPhone控制。每种箔片使用时还采用C-Quant杂散光仪测量视网膜上的杂散光水平。在第二次就诊时评估眩光测量和杂散光的可重复性。

结果

正如预期的那样,光晕大小随不同的遮挡箔片和目标对比度而增加(F = 29.564,P <.001),并且呈现出与杂散光测量相似的模式(F = 80.655,P < 0.001)。对比度较低的字母显示出更高的灵敏度,但眩光遮挡区域更大,导致屏幕视野产生天花板效应,500 Cw是最佳折衷值。阿斯顿眩光仪的观察者内和观察者间可重复性良好(500 Cw:0.84至0.93和0.53至0.73),与杂散光仪相似。

结论

该眩光仪提供了一种敏感、可重复的方法,能够在多个方向上量化患者可识别的残疾眩光形式,从而为主观报告的不适眩光增加客观性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验