Chiang ChengAn, Zhou ShuangBai, Liu Kai
Shanghai, People's Republic of China From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, affiliated to the School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan;137(1):114-121. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001931.
Although injection of hyaluronidase into surrounding tissues was proposed to treat arterial hyaluronic acid embolism, its application is still rather limited. The authors' goal was to investigate whether intravenous use of hyaluronidase can help resolve hyaluronic acid-induced arterial embolism.
Inferior epigastric arteries, nourishing inferior abdominal skin of rats, were injected with 0.02 ml of hyaluronic acid to create the animal model. The rats were divided randomly into four groups and given different solutions intravenously: hyaluronidase plus urokinase (group A), hyaluronidase (group B), urokinase (group C), or saline (group D). Progression of tissue necrosis in all groups was recorded for 1 week. The flap survival rate and mean percentage of surviving flap area were analyzed.
The animal model closely imitated actual hyaluronic acid arterial obstruction cases. Flap necrosis occurrence rates of each group were 10 percent in group A, 70 percent in group B, 80 percent in group C, and 90 percent in group D. The mean surviving flap areas of each group were 92.45 percent (group A), 47.67 percent (group B), 41.41 percent (group C), and 33.19 percent (group D). When hyaluronidase and urokinase were used together, the flap necrosis rate decreased significantly compared with that of the control group (p < 0.05). Even in cases of necrosis, group A had a higher average surviving flap area than did the other groups.
Combined use of hyaluronidase and urokinase can help increase the flap survival rate when administered intravenously in intraarterial hyaluronic acid occlusion cases. Both red thrombus and hyaluronic acid emboli must be dissolved for flap reperfusion. This method shows a promising effect for future application.
尽管有人提出向周围组织注射透明质酸酶来治疗动脉透明质酸栓塞,但其应用仍然相当有限。作者的目标是研究静脉使用透明质酸酶是否有助于解决透明质酸引起的动脉栓塞。
向滋养大鼠下腹部皮肤的腹壁下动脉注射0.02 ml透明质酸以建立动物模型。将大鼠随机分为四组,静脉给予不同溶液:透明质酸酶加尿激酶(A组)、透明质酸酶(B组)、尿激酶(C组)或生理盐水(D组)。记录所有组组织坏死的进展情况,为期1周。分析皮瓣存活率和存活皮瓣面积的平均百分比。
该动物模型紧密模拟了实际的透明质酸动脉阻塞病例。A组皮瓣坏死发生率为10%,B组为70%,C组为80%,D组为90%。各组存活皮瓣面积的平均值分别为92.45%(A组)、47.67%(B组)、41.41%(C组)和33.19%(D组)。透明质酸酶和尿激酶联合使用时,皮瓣坏死率与对照组相比显著降低(p<0.05)。即使在坏死病例中,A组的平均存活皮瓣面积也高于其他组。
在动脉内透明质酸阻塞病例中静脉给药时,透明质酸酶和尿激酶联合使用可有助于提高皮瓣存活率。为实现皮瓣再灌注,红色血栓和透明质酸栓子都必须溶解。该方法显示出有前景的未来应用效果。