Williams D C, Brosnan R J, Fletcher D J, Aleman M, Holliday T A, Tharp B, Kass P H, LeCouteur R A, Steffey E P
William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA.
Departments of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA.
J Vet Intern Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):289-303. doi: 10.1111/jvim.13813. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
The effects of anesthesia on the equine electroencephalogram (EEG) after administration of various drugs for sedation, induction, and maintenance are known, but not that the effect of inhaled anesthetics alone for EEG recording.
To determine the effects of isoflurane and halothane, administered as single agents at multiple levels, on the EEG and quantitative EEG (qEEG) of normal horses.
Six healthy horses.
Prospective study. Digital EEG with video and quantitative EEG (qEEG) were recorded after the administration of one of the 2 anesthetics, isoflurane or halothane, at 3 alveolar doses (1.2, 1.4 and 1.6 MAC). Segments of EEG during controlled ventilation (CV), spontaneous ventilation (SV), and with peroneal nerve stimulation (ST) at each MAC multiple for each anesthetic were selected, analyzed, and compared. Multiple non-EEG measurements were also recorded.
Specific raw EEG findings were indicative of changes in the depth of anesthesia. However, there was considerable variability in EEG between horses at identical MAC multiples/conditions and within individual horses over segments of a given epoch. Statistical significance for qEEG variables differed between anesthetics with bispectral index (BIS) CV MAC and 95% spectral edge frequency (SEF95) SV MAC differences in isoflurane only and median frequency (MED) differences in SV MAC with halothane only.
Unprocessed EEG features (background and transients) appear to be beneficial for monitoring the depth of a particular anesthetic, but offer little advantage over the use of changes in mean arterial pressure for this purpose.
已知各种用于镇静、诱导和维持的药物给药后麻醉对马脑电图(EEG)的影响,但单独吸入麻醉药对EEG记录的影响尚不清楚。
确定异氟烷和氟烷作为单一药物在多个水平给药时对正常马匹EEG和定量脑电图(qEEG)的影响。
6匹健康马匹。
前瞻性研究。在给予两种麻醉药(异氟烷或氟烷)之一后,于3个肺泡浓度(1.2、1.4和1.6 MAC)记录带视频的数字EEG和定量脑电图(qEEG)。选择、分析并比较每种麻醉药在每个MAC倍数下控制通气(CV)、自主通气(SV)以及腓总神经刺激(ST)期间的EEG片段。还记录了多个非EEG测量值。
特定的原始EEG表现提示麻醉深度的变化。然而,在相同MAC倍数/条件下不同马匹之间以及同一匹马在给定时间段内的EEG存在相当大的变异性。qEEG变量的统计学显著性在不同麻醉药之间有所不同,异氟烷仅在双谱指数(BIS)CV MAC和95%频谱边缘频率(SEF95)SV MAC方面存在差异,氟烷仅在SV MAC的中位数频率(MED)方面存在差异。
未经处理的EEG特征(背景和瞬态)似乎有利于监测特定麻醉的深度,但在此方面相较于使用平均动脉压的变化并无太大优势。