Hayen Arthur P, van den Berg Michael J, Meijboom Bert R, Struijs Jeroen N, Westert Gert P
Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, dpt. Tranzo (Scientific center for care and welfare), Tilburg University, Address: PO Box 90153, 5000, Tilburg, LE, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, Address: PO Box, 3720, Bilthoven, BA, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 30;15:580. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1250-0.
In several countries, health care policies gear toward strengthening the position of primary care physicians. Primary care physicians are increasingly expected to take accountability for overall spending and quality. Yet traditional models of paying physicians do not provide adequate incentives for taking on this new role. Under a so-called shared savings program physicians are instead incentivized to take accountability for spending and quality, as the program lets them share in cost savings when quality targets are met. We provide a structured approach to designing a shared savings program for primary care, and apply this approach to the design of a shared savings program for a Dutch chain of primary care providers, which is currently being piloted.
Based on the literature, we defined five building blocks of shared savings models that encompass the definition of the scope of the program, the calculation of health care expenditures, the construction of a savings benchmark, the assessment of savings and the rules and conditions under which savings are shared. We apply insights from a variety of literatures to assess the relative merits of alternative design choices within these building blocks. The shared savings program uses an econometric model of provider expenditures as an input to calculating a casemix-corrected benchmark.
The minimization of risk and uncertainty for both payer and provider is pertinent to the design of a shared savings program. In that respect, the primary care setting provides a number of unique opportunities for achieving cost and quality targets. Accountability can more readily be assumed due to the relatively long-lasting relationships between primary care physicians and patients. A stable population furthermore improves the confidence with which savings can be attributed to changes in population management. Challenges arise from the institutional context. The Dutch health care system has a fragmented structure and providers are typically small in size.
Shared savings programs fit the concept of enhanced primary care. Incorporating a shared savings program into existing payment models could therefore contribute to the financial sustainability of this organizational form.
在一些国家,医疗保健政策倾向于加强初级保健医生的地位。人们越来越期望初级保健医生对总体支出和质量负责。然而,传统的医生薪酬模式并未为承担这一新角色提供充分的激励措施。在所谓的共享节约计划中,医生会因对支出和质量负责而受到激励,因为该计划允许他们在达到质量目标时分享成本节约。我们提供了一种结构化方法来设计初级保健共享节约计划,并将此方法应用于为荷兰一家初级保健服务连锁机构设计共享节约计划,该计划目前正在进行试点。
基于文献,我们定义了共享节约模式的五个组成部分,包括计划范围的定义、医疗保健支出的计算、节约基准的构建、节约的评估以及共享节约的规则和条件。我们运用来自各种文献的见解来评估这些组成部分内替代设计选择的相对优点。共享节约计划使用提供者支出的计量经济模型作为计算病例组合校正基准的输入。
将付款人和提供者的风险及不确定性降至最低与共享节约计划的设计相关。在这方面,初级保健环境为实现成本和质量目标提供了一些独特的机会。由于初级保健医生与患者之间的关系相对持久,因此更容易承担责任。此外,稳定的人群提高了将节约归因于人群管理变化的可信度。挑战来自制度背景。荷兰医疗保健系统结构分散,提供者规模通常较小。
共享节约计划符合强化初级保健的理念。因此,将共享节约计划纳入现有支付模式有助于这种组织形式的财务可持续性。