Panturu Andreea, van Kleef Richard, Eijkenaar Frank, Cattel Daniëlle
Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Feb;82(1):43-57. doi: 10.1177/10775587241273355. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
Prospective payments for health care providers require adequate risk adjustment (RA) to address systematic variation in patients' health care needs. However, the design of RA for provider payment involves many choices and difficult trade-offs between incentives for risk selection, incentives for cost control, and feasibility. Despite a growing literature, a comprehensive framework of these choices and trade-offs is lacking. This article aims to develop such a framework. Using literature review and expert consultation, we identify key design choices for RA in the context of provider payment and subsequently categorize these choices along two dimensions: (a) the choice of risk adjusters and (b) the choice of payment weights. For each design choice, we provide an overview of options, trade-offs, and key references. By making design choices and associated trade-offs explicit, our framework facilitates customizing RA design to provider payment systems, given the objectives and other characteristics of the context of interest.
对医疗服务提供者的预期支付需要进行充分的风险调整(RA),以应对患者医疗需求的系统性差异。然而,用于提供者支付的风险调整设计涉及许多选择,以及在风险选择激励、成本控制激励和可行性之间的艰难权衡。尽管相关文献不断增加,但仍缺乏关于这些选择和权衡的全面框架。本文旨在构建这样一个框架。通过文献综述和专家咨询,我们确定了在提供者支付背景下风险调整的关键设计选择,并随后将这些选择沿两个维度进行分类:(a)风险调整因素的选择,以及(b)支付权重的选择。对于每个设计选择,我们提供了选项、权衡和关键参考文献的概述。通过明确设计选择和相关权衡,我们的框架有助于根据感兴趣的背景的目标和其他特征,将风险调整设计定制到提供者支付系统。