Rabinovich A, Bernard L, Ramanakumar A V, Stroian G, Gotlieb W H, Lau S, Bahoric B
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC;
Division of Radiation Oncology, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC;
Curr Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(6):405-11. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2727.
In patients with advanced-stage endometrial carcinoma (eca), extended-field radiotherapy (efrt) is traditionally delivered by the 3-dimensional conformal (3d-crt) 4-field box technique. In recent years, the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (imrt) in gynecologic cancers has increased. We compared the delivery of efrt by the 3d-crt and contemporary imrt techniques.
After surgical staging and adjuvant chemotherapy in 38 eca patients, efrt was delivered by either imrt or 3d-crt. Doses to the organs at risk, side effects, and outcomes were compared between the techniques.
Of the 38 eca patients, 33 were stage iiic, and 5 were stage ivb. In the imrt group, maximal doses to rectum, small intestine, and bladder were significantly higher, and mean dose to bladder was lower (p < 0.0001). Most acute gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematologic side effects were grade i or ii and were comparable between the groups. In long-term follow-up, only grade 1 cystitis at 3 months was statistically higher in the imrt patients. No grade iii or iv gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities were observed. No statistically significant differences in overall and disease-free survival or recurrence rates were observed between the techniques.
In advanced eca patients, imrt is a safe and effective technique for delivering efrt to the pelvis and para-aortic region, and it is comparable to the 3d-crt 4-field box technique in both side effects and efficacy. For centres in which imrt is not readily available, 3d-crt is a valid alternative.
在晚期子宫内膜癌(eca)患者中,传统上采用三维适形(3d-crt)四野盒式技术进行扩大野放疗(efrt)。近年来,调强放疗(imrt)在妇科癌症中的应用有所增加。我们比较了3d-crt和当代imrt技术在efrt中的应用情况。
38例eca患者经手术分期及辅助化疗后,分别采用imrt或3d-crt进行efrt。比较两种技术对危及器官的剂量、副作用及治疗效果。
38例eca患者中,33例为iiic期,5例为ivb期。在imrt组中,直肠、小肠和膀胱的最大剂量显著更高,膀胱的平均剂量更低(p<0.0001)。大多数急性胃肠道、泌尿生殖系统和血液学副作用为i级或ii级,两组间相当。在长期随访中,仅imrt患者3个月时的1级膀胱炎在统计学上更高。未观察到iii级或iv级胃肠道或泌尿生殖系统毒性。两种技术在总生存率、无病生存率或复发率方面未观察到统计学显著差异。
在晚期eca患者中,imrt是一种向盆腔和腹主动脉旁区域进行efrt的安全有效技术,在副作用和疗效方面与3d-crt四野盒式技术相当。对于无法轻易获得imrt的中心,3d-crt是一种有效的替代方法。