Proton Therapy Reduces Normal Tissue Dose in Extended-Field Pelvic Radiation for Endometrial Cancer.

PURPOSE

We dosimetrically compared pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node disease in endometrial carcinoma and present acute toxicities associated with extended-field PBS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with locally advanced endometrial malignancies were enrolled in an image-guided registry study. Seven of these patients were treated with PBS, and 18 patients were treated with IMRT. Organs at risk included pelvic bone marrow (PBM), small bowel (SB), large bowel (LB), rectum, bladder, and kidneys. The IMRT and PBS dosimetric parameters were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

RESULTS

Compared with IMRT PBM dose-volume histograms, PBS resulted in significantly lower dose volumes from 0 to 26.0 Gy ( < .05) and higher dose volumes from 33.9 to 42.9 Gy ( < .05). Overall, PBS resulted in 22% lower median PBM volume irradiated to 10 Gy (RBE) (PBS 71.3% versus IMRT 93.4%, < .001) and 14% lower median volume irradiated to 20 Gy (RBE) (PBS 65.1% versus IMRT 79.4%, < .001). Compared with IMRT, PBS also significantly reduced SB dose volumes from 0 to 27.5 Gy, LB dose volumes from 0 to 31.6 Gy, bladder dose volumes from 0 to 27.3 Gy, and rectal dose volumes from 0 to 7.6 Gy (all < .05). However, PBS resulted in higher rectal dose volumes compared with IMRT from 26.0 to 48.4 Gy. Grade 3+ hematologic toxicities were present in 2 (11%) IMRT-treated patients and no PBS-treated patients. No grade 3+ gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities were present in either treatment group.

CONCLUSION

In endometrial carcinoma, extended-field PBS is clinically feasible, resulting in statistically significant dose reduction to PBM as well as SB, LB, and bladder in the lower dose regions.