• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生命周期生态系统服务影响评估:承诺、问题与展望。

Assessment of Life Cycle Impacts on Ecosystem Services: Promise, Problems, and Prospects.

机构信息

Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST) , Department of Environmental Research & Innovation (ERIN), 41 Rue du Brill, 4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.

Vrije University Amsterdam , Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 1105 De Boelelaan, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Feb 2;50(3):1077-92. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03706. Epub 2016 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.5b03706
PMID:26717294
Abstract

The analysis of ecosystem services (ES) is becoming a key-factor to implement policies on sustainable technologies. Accordingly, life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods are more and more oriented toward the development of harmonized characterization models to address impacts on ES. However, such efforts are relatively recent and have not reached full consensus yet. We investigate here on the transdisciplinary pillars related to the modeling of LCIA on ES by conducting a critical review and comparison of the state-of-the-art in both LCIA and ES domains. We observe that current LCIA practices to assess impacts on "ES provision" suffer from incompleteness in modeling the cause-effect chains; the multifunctionality of ecosystems is omitted; and the "flow" nature of ES is not considered. Furthermore, ES modeling in LCIA is limited by its static calculation framework, and the valuation of ES also experiences some limitations. The conceptualization of land use (changes) as the main impact driver on ES, and the corresponding approaches to retrieve characterization factors, eventually embody several methodological shortcomings, such as the lack of time-dependency and interrelationships between elements in the cause-effect chains. We conclude that future LCIA modeling of ES could benefit from the harmonization with existing integrated multiscale dynamic integrated approaches.

摘要

生态系统服务(ES)的分析正成为实施可持续技术政策的关键因素。因此,生命周期影响评估(LCIA)方法越来越倾向于开发协调一致的特征化模型,以解决对 ES 的影响。然而,这些努力相对较新,尚未达成完全共识。我们通过对 LCIA 和 ES 领域的最新技术进行批判性回顾和比较,在此调查与 ES 的 LCIA 建模相关的跨学科支柱。我们观察到,当前评估“ES 提供”影响的 LCIA 实践在建模因果关系链方面存在不完整性;生态系统的多功能性被忽略;以及 ES 的“流动”性质未被考虑。此外,LCIA 中的 ES 建模受到其静态计算框架的限制,ES 的估值也存在一些局限性。将土地利用(变化)概念化为对 ES 的主要影响驱动因素,以及检索特征化因子的相应方法,最终体现了几个方法上的缺点,例如缺乏时间依赖性和因果关系链中元素之间的相互关系。我们得出结论,未来 ES 的 LCIA 建模可以受益于与现有综合多尺度动态综合方法的协调。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Life Cycle Impacts on Ecosystem Services: Promise, Problems, and Prospects.生命周期生态系统服务影响评估:承诺、问题与展望。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Feb 2;50(3):1077-92. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03706. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
2
Integrated earth system dynamic modeling for life cycle impact assessment of ecosystem services.综合地球系统动力学模型在生态系统服务生命周期影响评估中的应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Feb 15;472:262-72. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.099. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
3
Towards integrating the ecosystem services cascade framework within the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) cause-effect methodology.旨在将生态系统服务级联框架整合到生命周期评估(LCA)的因果关系方法中。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:1284-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
4
Quantification and valuation of ecosystem services in life cycle assessment: Application of the cascade framework to rice farming systems.生命周期评价中的生态系统服务量化和估值:级联框架在水稻种植系统中的应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 10;747:141278. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141278. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Toward harmonizing ecotoxicity characterization in life cycle impact assessment.朝向在生命周期影响评估中协调生态毒性特征化。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Dec;37(12):2955-2971. doi: 10.1002/etc.4261.
6
Biodiversity Assessment of Value Chains: State of the Art and Emerging Challenges.生物多样性评估价值链:现状与新挑战。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Aug 18;54(16):9715-9728. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05153. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
Ecosystem quality in LCIA: status quo, harmonization, and suggestions for the way forward.生命周期影响评价中的生态系统质量:现状、协调及未来发展建议
Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2018;23(10):1995-2006. doi: 10.1007/s11367-017-1422-8.
8
Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment: A novel conceptual framework for soil.生命周期评价中的生态系统服务:土壤的新概念框架
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 1;643:1337-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.191. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
9
Limitations of toxicity characterization in life cycle assessment: Can adverse outcome pathways provide a new foundation?生命周期评估中毒性表征的局限性:不良结局途径能否提供新的基础?
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Jul;12(3):580-90. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1708. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
10
Critical Review of Eutrophication Models for Life Cycle Assessment.生命周期评价中的富营养化模型的批判性回顾。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Sep 4;52(17):9562-9578. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00967. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization Factors to Assess Land Use Impacts on Pollinator Abundance in Life Cycle Assessment.用于评估生命周期评价中土地利用对传粉媒介丰度影响的特征化因子。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Feb 28;57(8):3445-3454. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c05311. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Linking freshwater ecotoxicity to damage on ecosystem services in life cycle assessment.将淡水生态毒性与生命周期评估中生态系统服务损害联系起来。
Environ Int. 2023 Jan;171:107705. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107705. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
Global process-based characterization factors of soil carbon depletion for life cycle impact assessment.
全球基于过程的土壤碳耗竭特征因子在生命周期影响评价中的应用。
Sci Data. 2021 Sep 9;8(1):237. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01018-2.
4
Life cycle assessment (LCA): informing the development of a sustainable circular bioeconomy?生命周期评估(LCA):为可持续循环生物经济的发展提供信息?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Sep 20;379(2206):20200352. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0352. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
5
LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative.联合国环境规划署-SETAC生命周期倡议中的生命周期影响评估框架及跨领域问题指南。
J Clean Prod. 2017 Sep 10;161:957-967. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.206.
6
Towards integrating the ecosystem services cascade framework within the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) cause-effect methodology.旨在将生态系统服务级联框架整合到生命周期评估(LCA)的因果关系方法中。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:1284-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Jul 5.