Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST) , Department of Environmental Research & Innovation (ERIN), 41 Rue du Brill, 4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Vrije University Amsterdam , Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 1105 De Boelelaan, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Feb 2;50(3):1077-92. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03706. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
The analysis of ecosystem services (ES) is becoming a key-factor to implement policies on sustainable technologies. Accordingly, life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods are more and more oriented toward the development of harmonized characterization models to address impacts on ES. However, such efforts are relatively recent and have not reached full consensus yet. We investigate here on the transdisciplinary pillars related to the modeling of LCIA on ES by conducting a critical review and comparison of the state-of-the-art in both LCIA and ES domains. We observe that current LCIA practices to assess impacts on "ES provision" suffer from incompleteness in modeling the cause-effect chains; the multifunctionality of ecosystems is omitted; and the "flow" nature of ES is not considered. Furthermore, ES modeling in LCIA is limited by its static calculation framework, and the valuation of ES also experiences some limitations. The conceptualization of land use (changes) as the main impact driver on ES, and the corresponding approaches to retrieve characterization factors, eventually embody several methodological shortcomings, such as the lack of time-dependency and interrelationships between elements in the cause-effect chains. We conclude that future LCIA modeling of ES could benefit from the harmonization with existing integrated multiscale dynamic integrated approaches.
生态系统服务(ES)的分析正成为实施可持续技术政策的关键因素。因此,生命周期影响评估(LCIA)方法越来越倾向于开发协调一致的特征化模型,以解决对 ES 的影响。然而,这些努力相对较新,尚未达成完全共识。我们通过对 LCIA 和 ES 领域的最新技术进行批判性回顾和比较,在此调查与 ES 的 LCIA 建模相关的跨学科支柱。我们观察到,当前评估“ES 提供”影响的 LCIA 实践在建模因果关系链方面存在不完整性;生态系统的多功能性被忽略;以及 ES 的“流动”性质未被考虑。此外,LCIA 中的 ES 建模受到其静态计算框架的限制,ES 的估值也存在一些局限性。将土地利用(变化)概念化为对 ES 的主要影响驱动因素,以及检索特征化因子的相应方法,最终体现了几个方法上的缺点,例如缺乏时间依赖性和因果关系链中元素之间的相互关系。我们得出结论,未来 ES 的 LCIA 建模可以受益于与现有综合多尺度动态综合方法的协调。