• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电影片段情感评价中的性别差异:与五种高唤醒情感类别的相互作用

Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories.

作者信息

Maffei Antonio, Vencato Valentina, Angrilli Alessandro

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

IN CNR Institute of Neuroscience, Padova Section, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145562. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0145562
PMID:26717488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4696842/
Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate gender differences in the emotional evaluation of 18 film clips divided into six categories: Erotic, Scenery, Neutral, Sadness, Compassion, and Fear. 41 female and 40 male students rated all clips for valence-pleasantness, arousal, level of elicited distress, anxiety, jittery feelings, excitation, and embarrassment. Analysis of positive films revealed higher levels of arousal, pleasantness, and excitation to the Scenery clips in both genders, but lower pleasantness and greater embarrassment in women compared to men to Erotic clips. Concerning unpleasant stimuli, unlike men, women reported more unpleasantness to the Compassion, Sadness, and Fear compared to the Neutral clips and rated them also as more arousing than did men. They further differentiated the films by perceiving greater arousal to Fear than to Compassion clips. Women rated the Sadness and Fear clips with greater Distress and Jittery feelings than men did. Correlation analysis between arousal and the other emotional scales revealed that, although men looked less aroused than women to all unpleasant clips, they also showed a larger variance in their emotional responses as indicated by the high number of correlations and their relatively greater extent, an outcome pointing to a masked larger sensitivity of part of male sample to emotional clips. We propose a new perspective in which gender difference in emotional responses can be better evidenced by means of film clips selected and clustered in more homogeneous categories, controlled for arousal levels, as well as evaluated through a number of emotion focused adjectives.

摘要

本研究旨在调查18个电影片段的情感评价中的性别差异,这些片段分为六类:色情、风景、中性、悲伤、同情和恐惧。41名女学生和40名男学生对所有片段的效价愉悦度、唤醒度、引发的痛苦程度、焦虑、紧张感、兴奋度和尴尬程度进行了评分。对积极电影的分析显示,两性对风景片段的唤醒度、愉悦度和兴奋度都较高,但与男性相比,女性对色情片段的愉悦度较低,尴尬程度较高。关于不愉快的刺激,与男性不同,女性报告说,与中性片段相比,她们对同情、悲伤和恐惧片段更不愉快,并且认为这些片段比男性更能唤起情绪。她们还通过感知到恐惧片段比同情片段有更高的唤醒度来区分这些电影。女性对悲伤和恐惧片段的痛苦和紧张感评分高于男性。唤醒度与其他情感量表之间的相关分析表明,尽管男性对所有不愉快片段的唤醒程度看起来比女性低,但他们的情感反应也表现出更大的差异,这体现在大量的相关性及其相对较大的程度上,这一结果表明男性样本的一部分对情感片段存在更大的隐蔽敏感性。我们提出了一个新的视角,通过选择并聚类为更同质的类别、控制唤醒水平以及通过一些关注情感的形容词进行评估的电影片段,可以更好地证明情感反应中的性别差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c37/4696842/31cb4a755d52/pone.0145562.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c37/4696842/4cb9539926b4/pone.0145562.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c37/4696842/31cb4a755d52/pone.0145562.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c37/4696842/4cb9539926b4/pone.0145562.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c37/4696842/31cb4a755d52/pone.0145562.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories.电影片段情感评价中的性别差异:与五种高唤醒情感类别的相互作用
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145562. eCollection 2015.
2
E-MOVIE - Experimental MOVies for Induction of Emotions in neuroscience: An innovative film database with normative data and sex differences.E-MOVIE - 用于神经科学中情感诱导的实验电影:一个具有规范数据和性别差异的创新电影数据库。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 3;14(10):e0223124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223124. eCollection 2019.
3
Gender effect in affective processing: Alpha EEG source analysis on emotional slides and film-clips.情感加工中的性别效应:情绪幻灯片和电影片段的 alpha EEG 源分析。
Psychophysiology. 2024 Jul;61(7):e14568. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14568. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
4
Spontaneous blink rate as an index of attention and emotion during film clips viewing.自发眨眼率作为观看电影片段时注意力和情绪的指标。
Physiol Behav. 2019 May 15;204:256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.037. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
5
Affective and cortical EEG gamma responses to emotional movies in women with high vs low traits of empathy.高共情特质与低共情特质女性对情绪电影的情感和皮质 EEG 伽马反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107175. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107175. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
6
Gender Differences in Emotional Response: Inconsistency between Experience and Expressivity.情绪反应中的性别差异:体验与表达之间的不一致。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0158666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158666. eCollection 2016.
7
Comparison of Slides and Video Clips as Different Methods for Inducing Emotions: An Electroencephalographic Alpha Modulation Study.幻灯片与视频片段作为诱发情绪的不同方法的比较:一项脑电图α调制研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 6;16:901422. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.901422. eCollection 2022.
8
Gastric myoelectrical activity as an index of emotional arousal.胃肌电活动作为情绪唤醒的一个指标。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Jul;61(1):70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.019. Epub 2006 Jan 3.
9
Eliciting emotion ratings for a set of film clips: A preliminary archive for research in emotion.为一系列电影片段引出情绪评分:用于情绪研究的初步档案。
J Soc Psychol. 2020 Nov 1;160(6):768-789. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1758016. Epub 2020 May 18.
10
What kind of erotic film clips should we use in female sex research? An exploratory study.在女性性行为研究中我们应该使用哪种色情电影片段?一项探索性研究。
J Sex Med. 2008 Jan;5(1):146-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00641.x. Epub 2007 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Heart rate and EEG gamma band connectivity in the ventral attention network during emotional movie stimulation in women with high emotion dysregulation.情绪调节能力差的女性在观看情感电影刺激时腹侧注意网络中的心率与脑电图γ频段连通性
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jun 25;19:1599349. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1599349. eCollection 2025.
2
Social anxiety influences the stress-buffering potential of social presence: Evidence from cardiovascular and affective reactivity under stress.社交焦虑影响社交陪伴的压力缓冲潜能:来自压力下心血管和情感反应的证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0325303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325303. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Inducing and assessing differentiated emotion-feeling states in the laboratory.在实验室中诱导和评估分化的情绪-感觉状态。
Cogn Emot. 1993 Mar;7(2):171-93. doi: 10.1080/02699939308409183.
2
Erotic subset for the Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS ERO): cross-sexual comparison study.内恩茨基情感图片系统的情色子集(NAPS ERO):跨性别比较研究。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 10;6:1336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01336. eCollection 2015.
3
Greater general startle reflex is associated with greater anxiety levels: a correlational study on 111 young women.
Emotional processing in patients with single brain damage in the right hemisphere.
右半球单脑损伤患者的情绪处理。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-01033-x.
4
Visually Perceived Negative Emotion Enhances Mismatch Negativity but Fails to Compensate for Age-Related Impairments.视觉感知的负面情绪增强失配负波,但无法弥补与年龄相关的损伤。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 27;16:903797. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.903797. eCollection 2022.
5
Event-Related Potentials in Women on the Pill: Neural Correlates of Positive and Erotic Stimulus Processing in Oral Contraceptive Users.服用避孕药女性的事件相关电位:口服避孕药使用者对积极和色情刺激处理的神经关联
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jan 4;15:798823. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.798823. eCollection 2021.
6
Experiencing happiness together facilitates dyadic coordination through the enhanced interpersonal neural synchronization.共同体验快乐通过增强人际神经同步促进了对偶协调。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 May 5;17(5):447-460. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab114.
7
Sex differences in high-level appreciation of automobile design-evoked gamma broadband synchronization.高水平欣赏汽车设计诱发的伽马宽带同步中的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 17;10(1):9797. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66515-7.
8
(Why) Do You Like Scary Movies? A Review of the Empirical Research on Psychological Responses to Horror Films.你为什么喜欢恐怖电影?关于对恐怖电影心理反应的实证研究综述。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 18;10:2298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02298. eCollection 2019.
9
E-MOVIE - Experimental MOVies for Induction of Emotions in neuroscience: An innovative film database with normative data and sex differences.E-MOVIE - 用于神经科学中情感诱导的实验电影:一个具有规范数据和性别差异的创新电影数据库。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 3;14(10):e0223124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223124. eCollection 2019.
10
The Increased Sex Differences in Susceptibility to Emotional Stimuli during Adolescence: An Event-Related Potential Study.青春期情绪刺激易感性中性别差异的增加:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jan 12;11:660. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00660. eCollection 2017.
更强的一般惊吓反射与更高的焦虑水平相关:一项针对111名年轻女性的相关性研究。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Feb 6;9:10. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00010. eCollection 2015.
4
Psychophysiological response patterns to affective film stimuli.情绪电影刺激的心理生理反应模式。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 30;8(4):e62661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062661. Print 2013.
5
The Emotional Movie Database (EMDB): a self-report and psychophysiological study.情感电影数据库(EMDB):一项自我报告和心理生理学研究。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012 Dec;37(4):279-94. doi: 10.1007/s10484-012-9201-6.
6
A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals.关于情绪信号处理中的性别差异的综述。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.022. Epub 2012 Jan 8.
7
Gender differences in emotional responses: a psychophysiological study.性别差异在情绪反应中的表现:一项心理生理学研究。
Physiol Behav. 2012 Feb 28;105(4):925-32. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.10.031. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
8
Gender differences in anxiety disorders: prevalence, course of illness, comorbidity and burden of illness.焦虑障碍中的性别差异:患病率、疾病进程、共病和疾病负担。
J Psychiatr Res. 2011 Aug;45(8):1027-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.03.006. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
9
Lack of startle blink potentiation to mutilation pictures irrespective of fearfulness.对残缺图片缺乏惊跳反射增强,而与恐惧无关。
Biol Psychol. 2010 Oct;85(2):338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
10
Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review.自主神经系统活动与情绪:综述。
Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):394-421. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Apr 4.