Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, UK.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2016 Jun;34(2):276-90. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12131. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
Do children attribute mortality and other life-cycle traits to all minded beings? The present study examined whether culture influences young children's ability to conceptualize and differentiate human beings from supernatural beings (such as God) in terms of life-cycle traits. Three-to-5-year-old Israeli and British children were questioned whether their mother, a friend, and God would be subject to various life-cycle processes: Birth, death, ageing, existence/longevity, and parentage. Children did not anthropomorphize but differentiated among human and supernatural beings, attributing life-cycle traits to humans, but not to God. Although 3-year-olds differentiated significantly among agents, 5-year-olds attributed correct life-cycle traits more consistently than younger children. The results also indicated some cross-cultural variation in these attributions. Implications for biological conceptual development are discussed.
儿童是否会将死亡和其他生命周期特征归因于所有有思维的生物?本研究考察了文化是否会影响幼儿根据生命周期特征将人类与超自然生物(如上帝)概念化和区分的能力。研究人员询问了 3 至 5 岁的以色列和英国儿童,他们的母亲、朋友和上帝是否会经历各种生命周期过程:出生、死亡、衰老、存在/长寿和生育。儿童没有拟人化,但将人类和超自然生物区分开来,将生命周期特征归因于人类,而不是上帝。尽管 3 岁的儿童在代理人之间有明显的区别,但 5 岁的儿童比年幼的儿童更一致地归因于正确的生命周期特征。结果还表明,这些归因存在一些跨文化差异。讨论了这些发现对生物概念发展的意义。