Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Feb;170(2):132-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3753.
The early language environment of a child influences language outcome, which in turn affects reading and academic success. It is unknown which types of everyday activities promote the best language environment for children.
To investigate whether the type of toy used during play is associated with the parent-infant communicative interaction.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Controlled experiment in a natural environment of parent-infant communication during play with 3 different toy sets. Participant recruitment and data collection were conducted between February 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014. The volunteer sample included 26 parent-infant (aged 10-16 months) dyads.
Fifteen-minute in-home parent-infant play sessions with electronic toys, traditional toys, and books.
Numbers of adult words, child vocalizations, conversational turns, parent verbal responses to child utterances, and words produced by parents in 3 different semantic categories (content-specific words) per minute during play sessions.
Among the 26 parent-infant dyads, toy type was associated with all outcome measures. During play with electronic toys, there were fewer adult words (mean, 39.62; 95% CI, 33.36-45.65), fewer conversational turns (mean, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12-2.19), fewer parental responses (mean, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.87-1.77), and fewer productions of content-specific words (mean, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.49-2.35) than during play with traditional toys or books. Children vocalized less during play with electronic toys (mean per minute, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.16-3.69) than during play with books (mean per minute, 3.91; 95% CI, 3.09-4.68). Parents produced fewer words during play with traditional toys (mean per minute, 55.56; 95% CI, 46.49-64.17) than during play with books (mean per minute, 66.89; 95% CI, 59.93-74.19) and use of content-specific words was lower during play with traditional toys (mean per minute, 4.09; 95% CI, 3.26-4.99) than during play with books (mean per minute, 6.96; 95% CI, 6.07-7.97).
Play with electronic toys is associated with decreased quantity and quality of language input compared with play with books or traditional toys. To promote early language development, play with electronic toys should be discouraged. Traditional toys may be a valuable alternative for parent-infant play time if book reading is not a preferred activity.
儿童的早期语言环境会影响语言发展,而语言发展又会影响阅读和学业成功。目前尚不清楚哪种类型的日常活动最有利于儿童的语言环境。
研究在游戏中使用的玩具类型是否与父母与婴儿的交流互动有关。
设计、环境和参与者:在自然环境中进行的父母与婴儿的游戏控制实验,使用了 3 种不同的玩具套装。参与者招募和数据收集于 2013 年 2 月 1 日至 2014 年 6 月 30 日进行。志愿者样本包括 26 对母婴(年龄 10-16 个月)。
15 分钟的家庭内母婴游戏时间,使用电子玩具、传统玩具和书籍。
在游戏过程中,每分钟成人词汇量、儿童发声次数、对话轮次、父母对儿童言语的回应次数、父母在 3 种不同语义类别(内容特定词汇)中产生的词汇量。
在 26 对母婴中,玩具类型与所有结果指标均有关联。与电子玩具相比,使用传统玩具或书籍进行游戏时,成人词汇量(平均 39.62;95%CI,33.36-45.65)、对话轮次(平均 1.64;95%CI,1.12-2.19)、父母回应(平均 1.31;95%CI,0.87-1.77)和内容特定词汇的生成(平均 1.89;95%CI,1.49-2.35)均较少。与使用书籍相比,儿童在使用电子玩具时发声较少(每分钟平均 2.9;95%CI,2.16-3.69)。与使用书籍相比,父母在使用传统玩具时生成的词汇量较少(每分钟平均 55.56;95%CI,46.49-64.17),而使用内容特定词汇的频率也较低(每分钟平均 4.09;95%CI,3.26-4.99)。
与书籍或传统玩具相比,玩电子玩具会导致语言输入的数量和质量下降。为了促进早期语言发展,应避免使用电子玩具。如果阅读不是首选活动,传统玩具可能是父母与婴儿玩耍时间的有价值的选择。