Psychology Department, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 20;13(1):9969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36734-9.
Protophones are considered to be precursors of speech. These vocalizations have been notably discussed in relation to toys and their importance for developing language skills. However, little is known about how natural objects, compared to artificial objects, may affect protophone production, an approach that could additionally help reconstruct how language evolved. In the current study, we examined protophone production in 58 infants (4-18 months) while interacting with their caregivers when using natural objects, household items, and toys. The infants were recorded in their home environment, in a rural area in Zambia. The results showed that the infants produced significantly fewer protophones when using natural objects than when using household items or toys. Importantly, this pattern was found only for the younger preverbal infants, and there was no indication in the data that the level of caregiver responsiveness differed with regard to the object type. Furthermore, the infants of the present work selected primarily the household items when exposed to both natural objects and household items. These findings suggest that natural objects are less likely to promote protophone production and, consequently, language skill development than artificial objects in preverbal infants, who seem to favor the latter, perhaps due to their features designed for specific functional purposes. Furthermore, these findings provide empirical evidence that the use of complex tools in social interactions may have helped to promote the evolution of language among hominins.
原语是语言的前身。这些发声在玩具及其对语言技能发展的重要性方面已经得到了特别的讨论。然而,对于自然物体如何影响原语的产生,与人工物体相比,人们知之甚少,这种方法可能有助于重建语言是如何进化的。在目前的研究中,我们在赞比亚农村地区的家庭环境中,对 58 名 4-18 个月大的婴儿与照顾者互动时使用自然物体、家居用品和玩具时的原语产生情况进行了研究。结果表明,婴儿使用自然物体时产生的原语明显少于使用家居用品或玩具时。重要的是,这种模式仅适用于较年轻的前语言婴儿,而且数据并没有表明,对于物体类型,照顾者的反应水平有差异。此外,本研究中的婴儿在接触自然物体和家居用品时,主要选择了家居用品。这些发现表明,与人工物体相比,自然物体不太可能促进前语言婴儿的原语产生和语言技能发展,婴儿似乎更喜欢后者,也许是因为它们具有特定功能目的的特征。此外,这些发现提供了经验证据,表明在社会互动中使用复杂工具可能有助于促进人类语言的进化。
Sci Rep. 2019-10-14
PLoS One. 2020-8-5
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021-10-25
Infant Behav Dev. 2021-11
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022-2-22
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021-10-25
Front Neurorobot. 2020-6-16
Child Dev. 2018-1-23
PLoS One. 2018-1-19