文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

相较于自然物体,婴儿会发出更多的前言语声音来模仿人造物体。

Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects.

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 20;13(1):9969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36734-9.


DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-36734-9
PMID:37339994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10282070/
Abstract

Protophones are considered to be precursors of speech. These vocalizations have been notably discussed in relation to toys and their importance for developing language skills. However, little is known about how natural objects, compared to artificial objects, may affect protophone production, an approach that could additionally help reconstruct how language evolved. In the current study, we examined protophone production in 58 infants (4-18 months) while interacting with their caregivers when using natural objects, household items, and toys. The infants were recorded in their home environment, in a rural area in Zambia. The results showed that the infants produced significantly fewer protophones when using natural objects than when using household items or toys. Importantly, this pattern was found only for the younger preverbal infants, and there was no indication in the data that the level of caregiver responsiveness differed with regard to the object type. Furthermore, the infants of the present work selected primarily the household items when exposed to both natural objects and household items. These findings suggest that natural objects are less likely to promote protophone production and, consequently, language skill development than artificial objects in preverbal infants, who seem to favor the latter, perhaps due to their features designed for specific functional purposes. Furthermore, these findings provide empirical evidence that the use of complex tools in social interactions may have helped to promote the evolution of language among hominins.

摘要

原语是语言的前身。这些发声在玩具及其对语言技能发展的重要性方面已经得到了特别的讨论。然而,对于自然物体如何影响原语的产生,与人工物体相比,人们知之甚少,这种方法可能有助于重建语言是如何进化的。在目前的研究中,我们在赞比亚农村地区的家庭环境中,对 58 名 4-18 个月大的婴儿与照顾者互动时使用自然物体、家居用品和玩具时的原语产生情况进行了研究。结果表明,婴儿使用自然物体时产生的原语明显少于使用家居用品或玩具时。重要的是,这种模式仅适用于较年轻的前语言婴儿,而且数据并没有表明,对于物体类型,照顾者的反应水平有差异。此外,本研究中的婴儿在接触自然物体和家居用品时,主要选择了家居用品。这些发现表明,与人工物体相比,自然物体不太可能促进前语言婴儿的原语产生和语言技能发展,婴儿似乎更喜欢后者,也许是因为它们具有特定功能目的的特征。此外,这些发现提供了经验证据,表明在社会互动中使用复杂工具可能有助于促进人类语言的进化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9750/10282070/7ae37e1c0912/41598_2023_36734_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9750/10282070/4c8a3b58caee/41598_2023_36734_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9750/10282070/7ae37e1c0912/41598_2023_36734_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9750/10282070/4c8a3b58caee/41598_2023_36734_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9750/10282070/7ae37e1c0912/41598_2023_36734_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects.

Sci Rep. 2023-6-20

[2]
Perspectives on the origin of language: Infants vocalize most during independent vocal play but produce their most speech-like vocalizations during turn taking.

PLoS One. 2022

[3]
Language Origins Viewed in Spontaneous and Interactive Vocal Rates of Human and Bonobo Infants.

Front Psychol. 2019-4-2

[4]
Preterm and full term infant vocalization and the origin of language.

Sci Rep. 2019-10-14

[5]
Social interaction facilitates word learning in preverbal infants: Word-object mapping and word segmentation.

Infant Behav Dev. 2017-8

[6]
The Origin of Protoconversation: An Examination of Caregiver Responses to Cry and Speech-Like Vocalizations.

Front Psychol. 2018-8-24

[7]
Social and endogenous infant vocalizations.

PLoS One. 2020-8-5

[8]
Protophones, the precursors to speech, dominate the human infant vocal landscape.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021-10-25

[9]
Opportunities for learning and social interaction in infant sitting: Effects of sitting support, sitting skill, and gross motor delay.

Dev Sci. 2023-5

[10]
The origin of language and relative roles of voice and gesture in early communication development.

Infant Behav Dev. 2021-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Young sanctuary-living chimpanzees produce more communicative expressions with artificial objects than with natural objects.

R Soc Open Sci. 2024-10-23

本文引用的文献

[1]
Vocal communication is tied to interpersonal arousal coupling in caregiver-infant dyads.

Elife. 2022-12-20

[2]
Visual object categorization in infancy.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022-2-22

[3]
Protophones, the precursors to speech, dominate the human infant vocal landscape.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021-10-25

[4]
Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development.

Front Psychol. 2021-1-8

[5]
Learning While Babbling: Prelinguistic Object-Directed Vocalizations Indicate a Readiness to Learn.

Infancy. 2010-7

[6]
Editorial: Body Representations, Peripersonal Space, and the Self: Humans, Animals, Robots.

Front Neurorobot. 2020-6-16

[7]
Development of social learning and play in BaYaka hunter-gatherers of Congo.

Sci Rep. 2019-7-31

[8]
The seeds of social learning: Infants exhibit more social looking for plants than other object types.

Cognition. 2018-11-29

[9]
The Myth of Universal Sensitive Responsiveness: Comment on Mesman et al. (2017).

Child Dev. 2018-1-23

[10]
Speech, stone tool-making and the evolution of language.

PLoS One. 2018-1-19

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索