Choi Giehae, Heo Seulkee, Lee Jong-Tae
a Department of Public Health Science , Graduate School, Korea University , Seoul , Korea.
b Division of Health Policy and Management , College of Health Science, Korea University , Seoul , Korea.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2016 Jan;66(1):28-37. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1107657.
Despite the existence of the universal right to a healthy environment, the right is being violated in some populations. The objective of the current study is to verify environmental discrimination associated with socioeconomic status in Korea, using synthetic air quality index and multiple indicators of socioeconomic status. The concentrations of NO₂(nitrogen dioxide), CO (carbon monoxide), SO₂(sulfur dioxide), PM10 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter <10 μm), and O₃(ozone) in ambient air were integrated into a synthetic air quality index. Socioeconomic status was measured at individual level (income, education, number of household members, occupation, and National Basic Livelihood status) and area level (neighborhood index). The neighborhood index was calculated in the finest administrative unit (municipality) by performing standardization and integration of municipality-level data of the following: number of families receiving National Basic Livelihood, proportion of people engaged in an elementary occupation, population density, and number of service industries. Each study participant was assigned a neighborhood index value of the municipality in which they reside. Six regression models were generated to analyze the relationship between socioeconomic status and overall air pollution. All models were adjusted with sex, age, and smoking status. Stratification was conducted by residency (urban/rural). Moran's I was calculated to identify spatial clusters, and adjusted regression analysis was conducted to account for spatial autocorrelation. Results showed that people with higher neighborhood index, people living with smaller number of family members, and people with no education lived in municipalities with better overall air quality. The association differed by residency in some cases, and consideration of spatial autocorrelation altered the association. This study gives strength to the idea that environmental discrimination exists in some socioeconomic groups in Korea, and that residency and spatial autocorrelation must be considered in order to fully understand environmental disparities.
This is the first study that provides the possible evidence of the environmental injustice in Korea using air quality index. The findings suggested that air quality index was negatively correlated with several important socioeconomic status measured at either individual or area level. The main implication of this paper, therefore, is to provide another insight to environmental policy makers to consider environmental injustice problem into community intervention for resolving the public health problems by air pollution.
尽管存在享有健康环境的普遍权利,但在一些人群中这一权利正受到侵犯。本研究的目的是利用综合空气质量指数和社会经济地位的多个指标,验证韩国社会经济地位与环境歧视之间的关联。将环境空气中二氧化氮(NO₂)、一氧化碳(CO)、二氧化硫(SO₂)、细颗粒物(PM10,空气动力学直径<10μm的颗粒物)和臭氧(O₃)的浓度整合为一个综合空气质量指数。社会经济地位在个体层面(收入、教育程度、家庭成员数量、职业和国家基本生活保障状况)和区域层面(邻里指数)进行衡量。邻里指数是通过对以下市级数据进行标准化和整合,在最精细的行政单位(市)计算得出:领取国家基本生活保障的家庭数量、从事初级职业的人口比例、人口密度和服务业数量。为每位研究参与者分配其居住市的邻里指数值。生成了六个回归模型来分析社会经济地位与总体空气污染之间的关系。所有模型均根据性别、年龄和吸烟状况进行了调整。按居住地区(城市/农村)进行分层。计算莫兰指数(Moran's I)以识别空间聚类,并进行调整后的回归分析以考虑空间自相关。结果表明,邻里指数较高的人、家庭成员数量较少的人和未受过教育的人居住在总体空气质量较好的市。在某些情况下,这种关联因居住地区而异,并且考虑空间自相关改变了这种关联。本研究支持了这样一种观点,即韩国的一些社会经济群体中存在环境歧视,并且为了充分理解环境差异,必须考虑居住地区和空间自相关。
这是第一项利用空气质量指数提供韩国环境不公正可能证据的研究。研究结果表明,空气质量指数与在个体或区域层面衡量的几个重要社会经济地位呈负相关。因此,本文的主要启示是为环境政策制定者提供另一种视角,以便在通过空气污染解决公共卫生问题的社区干预中考虑环境不公正问题。