Poremski Daniel, Rabouin Daniel, Latimer Eric
Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Douglas Mental Health University Institute, 6875 Boul. LaSalle, Perry 3C, Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Mar;44(2):217-224. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0713-2.
Individual placement and support (IPS) has not been tested experimentally among people recently housed with a scattered-site Housing First program. Ninety recently housed people were randomized to IPS or usual services. Regression models estimated via GEE were used to compare employment outcomes. Over 8 months of follow-up with good fidelity, fifteen (34 %) people in the IPS group versus nine (22 %) in the control group found competitive employment (p = 0.16). Adjusted odds of obtaining competitive employment were greater in the IPS group (OR 2.42, 95 %CI 1.13-5.16). Other employment outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Satisfaction with services was greater in the group receiving IPS. In this study, IPS was a modestly useful adjunct to scattered-site Housing First for people with mental illness who have been homeless.
针对近期通过分散式“住房优先”项目安置的人群,尚未对个体安置与支持(IPS)模式进行实验测试。90名近期获得安置的人员被随机分配至IPS组或接受常规服务组。通过广义估计方程(GEE)估计的回归模型用于比较就业结果。在长达8个月的高保真随访中,IPS组有15人(34%)找到了竞争性工作,而对照组为9人(22%)(p = 0.16)。IPS组获得竞争性工作的调整后优势比更高(优势比2.42,95%置信区间1.13 - 5.16)。两组之间的其他就业结果无显著差异。接受IPS服务的组对服务的满意度更高。在本研究中,对于患有精神疾病的无家可归者,IPS是分散式“住房优先”模式的一种适度有用的辅助手段。