Calciolari Stefano, Ilinca Stefania
Università della Svizzera Italiana, IdEP Institute, Lugano, Switzerland.
European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna, Austria.
Health Policy. 2016 Jan;120(1):129-38. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
In recent decades, consensus has grown on the need to organize health systems around the concept of care integration to better confront the challenges associated with demographic trends and financial sustainability. However, care integration remains an imprecise umbrella term in both the academic and policy arenas. In addition, little substantive knowledge exists on the success factors for integration initiatives. We propose a composite measure of care integration and a conceptual framework suggesting its relationships with three types of antecedents: contextual, cultural, and organizational factors. Our framework was tested using data from the Italian National Health System (NHS). We administered an ad-hoc questionnaire to all Italian local health units (LHUs), with a 60.4% response rate, and used structural equation modeling to assess the relationships between the relevant latent constructs. The results validated our measure of care integration and supported the hypothesized relationships. In particular, integration was found to be fostered by results-oriented institutional settings, a professional culture conducive to inclusiveness and shared goals, and organizational arrangements promoting clear expectations among providers. Thus, integration improves care and mediates the effects of specific operating means on care enhancement.
近几十年来,围绕以医疗整合概念来组织卫生系统以更好应对与人口趋势和财务可持续性相关挑战的必要性,已达成越来越多的共识。然而,在学术和政策领域,医疗整合仍然是一个不精确的笼统术语。此外,关于整合举措的成功因素,实质性知识很少。我们提出了一种医疗整合的综合衡量方法以及一个概念框架,表明其与三种类型的先行因素(背景、文化和组织因素)之间的关系。我们的框架使用来自意大利国家卫生系统(NHS)的数据进行了测试。我们向所有意大利地方卫生单位(LHU)发放了一份专门设计的问卷,回复率为60.4%,并使用结构方程模型来评估相关潜在结构之间的关系。结果验证了我们的医疗整合衡量方法,并支持了假设的关系。特别是,结果导向的制度环境、有利于包容性和共同目标的专业文化以及促进提供者之间明确期望的组织安排被发现有助于促进整合。因此,整合改善了医疗服务,并调节了特定运营手段对医疗改善的影响。