School of Psychology, University of Talca.
School of Education and Social Work, University of Valladolid.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Jan;125(1):125-137. doi: 10.1037/abn0000115.
We tested first-order factor and bifactor models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) to adequately summarize the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, (DSM-IV-TR) symptoms observed in a Spanish sample of preschoolers and kindergarteners. Six ESEM and CFA models were estimated based on teacher evaluations of the behavior of 638 children 4 to 6 years of age. An ESEM bifactor model with a central dimension plus 3 specific factors (inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity) showed the best fit and interpretability. Strict invariance between the sexes was observed. The bifactor model provided a solution to previously encountered inconsistencies in the factorial models of ADHD in young children. However, the low reliability of the specific factors casts doubt on the utility of the subscales for ADHD measurement. More research is necessary to clarify the nature of G and S factors of ADHD.
我们使用验证性因子分析(CFA)和探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)来检验注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的一阶因子和双因子模型,以充分总结西班牙学龄前和幼儿园儿童中观察到的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 4 版(DSM-IV-TR)症状。根据 638 名 4 至 6 岁儿童的教师对其行为的评估,我们对 6 个 ESEM 和 CFA 模型进行了估计。具有中心维度加 3 个特定因子(注意力不集中、多动和冲动)的 ESEM 双因子模型具有最佳的拟合度和可解释性。还观察到了性别之间的严格不变性。双因子模型为解决先前在幼儿 ADHD 的因子模型中遇到的不一致性提供了一种解决方案。然而,特定因子的低可靠性使得 ADHD 测量的子量表的实用性受到了质疑。需要进一步的研究来阐明 ADHD 的 G 和 S 因子的性质。