Suppr超能文献

老年急性肌肉骨骼疼痛急诊科患者镇痛药选择共同决策的前瞻性评估

A Prospective Evaluation of Shared Decision-making Regarding Analgesics Selection for Older Emergency Department Patients With Acute Musculoskeletal Pain.

作者信息

Holland Wesley C, Hunold Katherine M, Mangipudi Sowmya A, Rittenberg Alison M, Yosipovitch Natalie, Platts-Mills Timothy F

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):306-14. doi: 10.1111/acem.12888. Epub 2016 Feb 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Musculoskeletal pain is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visit by older adults. Outpatient pain management following ED visits in this population is challenging as a result of contraindications to, and side effects from, available therapies. Shared decision-making (SDM) between patients and emergency physicians may improve patient experiences and health outcomes. Among older ED patients with acute musculoskeletal pain, we sought to characterize their desire for involvement in the selection of outpatient analgesics. We also sought to assess the impact of SDM on change in pain at 1 week, patient satisfaction, and side effects.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of adults aged 60 years and older presenting to the ED with acute musculoskeletal pain. Participants' desire to contribute to outpatient analgesic selection was assessed by phone within 24 hours of ED discharge using the Control Preferences Scale and categorized as active, collaborative, or passive. The extent to which SDM occurred in the ED was also assessed within 24 hours of discharge using the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire, and scores were subsequently grouped into tertiles of low, middle, and high SDM. The primary outcome was change in pain severity between the ED visit and 1 week. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction regarding the decision about how to treat pain at home, satisfaction with the pain medication itself, and side effects.

RESULTS

Desire of participants (N = 94) to contribute to the decision regarding selection of outpatient analgesics varied: 16% active (i.e., make the final decision themselves), 37% collaborative (i.e., share decision with provider), and 47% passive (i.e., let the doctor make the final decision). The percentage of patients who desired an active role in the decision was higher for patients who were college educated versus those who were not college educated (28% vs. 11%; difference 17%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0% to 35%), received care from a nurse practitioner versus a resident or an attending physician (32% vs. 9%; difference 23%, 95% CI = 4% to 42%), or received care from a female versus a male provider (24% vs. 5%; difference 19%, 95% = CI 5% to 32%). After potential confounders were adjusted for, the mean decrease in pain severity from the ED visit to 1-week follow-up was not significantly different across tertiles of SDM (p = 0.06). Higher SDM scores were associated with greater satisfaction with the discharge pain medications (p = 0.006). SDM was not associated with the class of analgesic received.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample of older adults with acute musculoskeletal pain, the reported desire of patients to contribute to decisions regarding analgesics varied based on both patient and provider characteristics. SDM was not significantly related to pain reduction in the first week or type of pain medication received, but was associated with greater patient satisfaction.

摘要

目的

肌肉骨骼疼痛是老年人前往急诊科就诊的常见原因。由于现有治疗方法存在禁忌症和副作用,该人群在急诊科就诊后的门诊疼痛管理具有挑战性。患者与急诊医生之间的共同决策(SDM)可能会改善患者体验和健康结局。在患有急性肌肉骨骼疼痛的老年急诊科患者中,我们试图了解他们参与选择门诊镇痛药的意愿。我们还试图评估共同决策对1周时疼痛变化、患者满意度和副作用的影响。

方法

这是一项对60岁及以上因急性肌肉骨骼疼痛到急诊科就诊的成年人进行的前瞻性研究。在急诊科出院后24小时内通过电话使用控制偏好量表评估参与者对门诊镇痛药选择的参与意愿,并分为主动、协作或被动三类。在出院后24小时内还使用9项共同决策问卷评估急诊科共同决策的程度,随后将得分分为低、中、高共同决策三分位数。主要结局是急诊科就诊与1周时疼痛严重程度的变化。次要结局包括对在家中疼痛治疗决策的满意度、对止痛药本身的满意度以及副作用。

结果

参与者(N = 94)对门诊镇痛药选择决策的参与意愿各不相同:16%为主动(即自己做出最终决定),37%为协作(即与提供者共同做出决定),47%为被动(即让医生做出最终决定)。在决策中希望发挥积极作用的患者比例,受过大学教育的患者高于未受过大学教育的患者(28%对11%;差异17%,95%置信区间[CI] = 0%至35%),接受执业护士护理的患者高于住院医师或主治医师护理的患者(32%对9%;差异23%,95% CI = 4%至42%),接受女性提供者护理的患者高于男性提供者护理的患者(24%对5%;差异19%,95% = CI 5%至32%)。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,共同决策三分位数之间从急诊科就诊到1周随访时疼痛严重程度的平均降低没有显著差异(p = 0.06)。较高的共同决策得分与对出院时止痛药的更高满意度相关(p = 0.006)。共同决策与所接受的镇痛药类别无关。

结论

在这个患有急性肌肉骨骼疼痛的老年人群样本中,报告的患者对镇痛药决策的参与意愿因患者和提供者特征而异。共同决策与第一周的疼痛减轻或所接受的止痛药类型没有显著关系,但与更高的患者满意度相关。

相似文献

5

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Patient Perspectives of Acute Pain Management in the Era of the Opioid Epidemic.阿片类药物流行时代急性疼痛管理的患者视角
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;66(3):246-252.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
4
Emergency physician perceptions of shared decision-making.急诊医生对共同决策的看法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;22(4):399-405. doi: 10.1111/acem.12627. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
5
Comparison of brief health literacy screens in the emergency department.急诊科简短健康素养筛查的比较
J Health Commun. 2015;20(5):539-45. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.999893. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验