Suppr超能文献

与“脓毒症鲨鱼”的赛跑。

The race against the "septic shark".

作者信息

Westphal Martin, Kampmeier Tim

出版信息

Crit Care. 2015;19 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S11. doi: 10.1186/cc14729. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

Abstract

Great white sharks are responsible for about 10 cases of death annually worldwide, as compared with millions of deaths caused by sepsis. However, the basic principles of avoiding shark attacks and fighting sepsis seem to be similar: avoidance, attention, and speed, if necessary. The present review discusses the current status of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, which are actually content for discussion because of their low specificity. Current data suggest that one in eight patients with severe sepsis does not fulfill the SIRS criteria and is consequently missed, and therefore the calls for new definitions of sepsis are getting louder. Furthermore, the need for early treatment of sepsis and fast admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) with experienced stuff is reviewed as well as the early and appropriate initiation of therapy, namely antibiotic and volume therapy. A key feature is the analysis of the studies from the so-called "Sepsis Trilogy" (ProCESS, ARISE, and ProMiSe studies), with a focus on the status of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). The authors of the "Sepsis Trilogy" concluded that there is no benefit regarding survival in septic patients by using EGDT as compared with standard therapy. However, the low mortality of the control groups within the "Sepsis Trilogy" studies as compared with the Rivers et al. study from 2001 leads to the conclusion that there has been an improvement in the therapy of septic patients, most probably due to the early initiation of therapy as a kind of "standard" in sepsis therapy. Finally, the phenomenon of a "large trial disease" is discussed, exemplary in a trial which investigated the maintenance of the "right" mean arterial pressure in sepsis patients. Even if the result of a large randomized trial might be that there is no difference between two study groups, the real exercise is to identify the patient collectives who might benefit or experience harm due to an intervention. In summary, as compared with swimming in dangerous waters, high attention is needed in handling septic patients. Once an attack has occurred, speed is of utmost importance (i.e., initiation of therapy and admission to the ICU) because it appears logical that time is critical in septic patients This may have resulted in the implementation of early (goal-directed) treatment as a "standard" in the treatment of sepsis with significant improvement in survival.

摘要

全球范围内,每年约有10人死于大白鲨袭击,而败血症导致的死亡人数达数百万。然而,避免鲨鱼袭击和对抗败血症的基本原则似乎相似:必要时做到避免、警惕和迅速行动。本综述讨论了全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准的现状,因其特异性低,实际上仍有待探讨。目前的数据表明,每八名严重脓毒症患者中就有一名不符合SIRS标准,因此被漏诊,所以对脓毒症新定义的呼声越来越高。此外,还探讨了脓毒症早期治疗的必要性、迅速入住配备经验丰富医护人员的重症监护病房(ICU),以及早期且适当的治疗启动,即抗生素和容量治疗。一个关键特征是对所谓“脓毒症三部曲”(ProCESS、ARISE和ProMiSe研究)的研究分析,重点关注早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)的现状。“脓毒症三部曲”的作者得出结论,与标准治疗相比,使用EGDT对脓毒症患者的生存没有益处。然而,与2001年里弗斯等人的研究相比,“脓毒症三部曲”研究中对照组的低死亡率表明脓毒症患者的治疗已有改善,很可能是因为早期开始治疗已成为脓毒症治疗的一种“标准”。最后,讨论了“大型试验疾病”现象,以一项研究脓毒症患者“正确”平均动脉压维持情况的试验为例。即使大型随机试验的结果可能是两个研究组之间没有差异,但真正的挑战是确定哪些患者群体可能因干预而受益或受到伤害。总之,与在危险水域游泳相比,处理脓毒症患者需要高度警惕。一旦发病,速度至关重要(即开始治疗和入住ICU),因为显然时间对脓毒症患者至关重要。这可能导致早期(目标导向)治疗成为脓毒症治疗的“标准”,并使生存率显著提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a99/4699162/eeb55bdee305/cc14729-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验