Suppr超能文献

不问不说:对社交焦虑症治疗研究中参与者特征报告程度的系统评价。

Don't ask, don't tell: a systematic review of the extent to which participant characteristics are reported in social anxiety treatment studies.

作者信息

Johnson Suzanne B, Anderson Page L

机构信息

a Clinical Psychology , Georgia State University , Atlanta , GA , USA.

出版信息

Anxiety Stress Coping. 2016 Nov;29(6):589-605. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2016.1138289. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study examined the extent to which social anxiety treatment studies report the demographic characteristics of their participants. One hundred and 56 treatment studies published in English between 2001 and 2012 articles were collected.

METHODS

Each study was evaluated on whether or not it reported information on gender, age, race, relationship status, education, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and disability and also the extent to which the racial composition of the sample was described.

RESULTS

The majority of studies reported information on age (96.2%) and gender (94.2%), but the percentage of studies that reported anything else is much lower: race (50.0%), education (42.3%), relationship status (37.8%), socioeconomic status (5.1%), disability (2.6%), and sexual orientation (1.3%). One third (34.0%) of studies reported the race of all participants in their samples, while the remaining reported no information or information for only a subset of participants (e.g. "mostly white").

CONCLUSIONS

Participants of social anxiety disorder treatment studies generally are not described beyond their age and gender. Standards for reporting participant characteristics of treatment studies (similar to standards for reporting the methodology of treatment studies) could improve clinical researchers' and clinicians' ability to evaluate the external validity of this body of work.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究调查了社交焦虑症治疗研究在报告参与者人口统计学特征方面的程度。收集了2001年至2012年间发表的156篇英文治疗研究文章。

方法

评估每项研究是否报告了关于性别、年龄、种族、恋爱状况、教育程度、社会经济地位、性取向和残疾的信息,以及样本种族构成的描述程度。

结果

大多数研究报告了年龄(96.2%)和性别(94.2%)的信息,但报告其他任何信息的研究比例要低得多:种族(50.0%)、教育程度(42.3%)、恋爱状况(37.8%)、社会经济地位(5.1%)、残疾(2.6%)和性取向(1.3%)。三分之一(34.0%)的研究报告了样本中所有参与者的种族,而其余研究未报告任何信息或仅报告了部分参与者的信息(例如“大多是白人”)。

结论

社交焦虑症治疗研究的参与者通常除了年龄和性别外没有更多描述。报告治疗研究参与者特征的标准(类似于报告治疗研究方法的标准)可以提高临床研究人员和临床医生评估这项工作外部效度的能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验