Sulaiman Imran, Mac Hale Elaine, Holmes Martin, Hughes Cian, D'Arcy Shona, Taylor Terrence, Rapcan Viliam, Doyle Frank, Breathnach Aoife, Seheult Jansen, Murphy Desmond, Hunt Eoin, Lane Stephen J, Sahadevan Abhilash, Crispino Gloria, Diette Greg, Killane Isabelle, Reilly Richard B, Costello Richard W
Clinical Research Centre, Smurfit Building Beaumont Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Bioengineering, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 4;6(1):e009350. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009350.
In clinical practice, it is difficult to distinguish between patients with refractory asthma from those with poorly controlled asthma, where symptoms persist due to poor adherence, inadequate inhaler technique or comorbid diseases. We designed an audio recording device which, when attached to an inhaler, objectively identifies the time and technique of inhaler use, thereby assessing both aspects of adherence. This study will test the hypothesis that feedback on these two aspects of adherence when passed on to patients improves adherence and helps clinicians distinguish refractory from difficult-to-control asthma.
This is a single, blind, prospective, randomised, clinical trial performed at 5 research centres. Patients with partially controlled or uncontrolled severe asthma who have also had at least one severe asthma exacerbation in the prior year are eligible to participate. The effect of two types of nurse-delivered education interventions to promote adherence and inhaler technique will be assessed. The active group will receive feedback on their inhaler technique and adherence from the new device over a 3-month period. The control group will also receive training in inhaler technique and strategies to promote adherence, but no feedback from the device. The primary outcome is the difference in actual adherence, a measure that incorporates time and technique of inhaler use between groups at the end of the third month. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients who remain refractory despite good adherence, and differences in the components of adherence after the intervention. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol basis. The sample size is 220 subjects (110 in each group), and loss to follow-up is estimated at 10% which will allow results to show a 10% difference (0.8 power) in adherence between group means with a type I error probability of 0.05.
NCT01529697; Pre-results.
在临床实践中,很难区分难治性哮喘患者和控制不佳的哮喘患者,后者的症状持续存在是由于依从性差、吸入器使用技术不当或合并其他疾病。我们设计了一种音频记录设备,将其连接到吸入器上,可以客观地识别吸入器的使用时间和技术,从而评估依从性的两个方面。本研究将检验以下假设:当将这两个依从性方面的反馈传达给患者时,可提高依从性,并帮助临床医生区分难治性哮喘和难以控制的哮喘。
这是一项在5个研究中心进行的单盲、前瞻性、随机临床试验。在前一年至少有一次严重哮喘发作的部分控制或未控制的重度哮喘患者有资格参与。将评估两种由护士提供的教育干预措施对促进依从性和吸入器使用技术的效果。干预组将在3个月内收到来自新设备的关于其吸入器使用技术和依从性的反馈。对照组也将接受吸入器使用技术培训和促进依从性的策略,但不会收到来自设备的反馈。主要结局是实际依从性的差异,这是一个在第三个月末纳入吸入器使用时间和技术的指标。次要结局包括尽管依从性良好但仍为难治性的患者数量,以及干预后依从性各组成部分的差异。将根据意向性分析和符合方案分析对数据进行分析。样本量为220名受试者(每组110名),估计失访率为10%,这将使结果显示组间依从性有10%的差异(检验效能为0.8),I类错误概率为0.05。
NCT01529697;预结果。