Basheti Iman A, Bosnic-Anticevich Sinthia Z, Armour Carol L, Reddel Helen K
Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science University, Amman, Jordan.
Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Respir Care. 2014 Jul;59(7):1140-54. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02342. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Turbuhaler and Diskus are commonly used powder inhaler devices for patients with respiratory disease. Their effectiveness is limited in part by a patient's ability to use them correctly. This has led to numerous studies being conducted over the last decade to assess the correct use of these devices by patients and health care professionals. These studies have generally used device-specific checklists to assess technique, this being the most feasible and accessible method for assessment. However, divergence between the checklists and scoring systems for the same device in different studies makes direct comparison of results difficult and at times inappropriate. Little evidence is available to assess the relative importance of different criteria; however, brief patient training based on specific inhaler technique checklists leads to significant improvement in asthma outcomes. This paper reviews common checklists and scoring systems used for Turbuhaler and Diskus, discusses the problem of heterogeneity between different checklists, and finally recommends suitable checklists and scoring systems for these devices based on the literature and previous findings. Only when similar checklists are used across different research studies will accurate comparisons and meta-analysis be possible.
都保和准纳器是常用于呼吸系统疾病患者的干粉吸入装置。它们的有效性部分受到患者正确使用能力的限制。这导致在过去十年中进行了大量研究,以评估患者和医护人员对这些装置的正确使用情况。这些研究通常使用特定装置的检查表来评估技术,这是最可行且易于采用的评估方法。然而,不同研究中同一装置的检查表和评分系统之间存在差异,使得结果的直接比较变得困难,有时甚至不合适。几乎没有证据可用于评估不同标准的相对重要性;然而,基于特定吸入器技术检查表的简短患者培训可显著改善哮喘治疗效果。本文回顾了用于都保和准纳器的常见检查表和评分系统,讨论了不同检查表之间的异质性问题,最后根据文献和先前的研究结果为这些装置推荐合适的检查表和评分系统。只有在不同研究中使用相似的检查表时,才有可能进行准确的比较和荟萃分析。