Bellet Meritxell, Gray Kathryn P, Francis Prudence A, Láng István, Ciruelos Eva, Lluch Ana, Climent Miguel Angel, Catalán Gustavo, Avella Antoni, Bohn Uriel, González-Martin Antonio, Ferrer Roser, Catalán Roberto, Azaro Analía, Rajasekaran Agnita, Morales Josefa, Vázquez Josep, Fleming Gini F, Price Karen N, Regan Meredith M
Meritxell Bellet and Analía Azaro, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology; Meritxell Bellet, Roser Ferrer, Roberto Catalán, and Analía Azaro, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital; Meritxell Bellet, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Meritxell Bellet, Eva Ciruelos, Ana Lluch, Miguel Angel Climent, Gustavo Catalán, Antoni Avella, Uriel Bohn, Antonio González-Martin, Josefa Morales, and Josep Vázquez, SOLTI Group, Barcelona; Eva Ciruelos, University Hospital 12 de Octubre; Antonio González-Martin, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid; Ana Lluch, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia/Incliva Biomedical Research Institute; Miguel Angel Climent, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia; Gustavo Catalán, Hospital Son Llàtzer; Antoni Avella, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca; Uriel Bohn, Hospital Dr Negrín de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain; Kathryn P. Gray and Meredith M. Regan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Kathryn P. Gray, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Kathryn P. Gray, Karen N. Price, and Meredith M. Regan, International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center; Karen N. Price, Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation; Meredith M. Regan, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Agnita Rajasekaran, inVentiv Health Clinical Laboratory, Princeton, NJ; Gini F. Fleming, The University of Chicago Medical Center and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Prudence A. Francis, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and István Láng, National Institute of Oncology and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Budapest, Hungary.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 10;34(14):1584-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2259. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
To describe estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), and estrone sulfate (E1S) levels during the first year of monthly triptorelin plus exemestane or tamoxifen and to assess possible suboptimal suppression while receiving exemestane plus triptorelin.
Premenopausal patients with early breast cancer on the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial who selected triptorelin as the ovarian suppression method and were randomly assigned to exemestane plus triptorelin or tamoxifen plus triptorelin were enrolled until the target population of 120 patients was reached. Blood sampling time points were 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months. Serum estrogens were measured with a highly sensitive and specific assay. This preplanned 12-month analysis evaluated E2, E1, E1S, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone levels in all patients and the proportion of patients with E2 levels greater than 2.72 pg/mL at any time point during treatment with exemestane plus triptorelin.
One hundred sixteen patients (exemestane, n = 86; tamoxifen, n = 30; median age, 44 years; median E2, 51 pg/mL; 55% prior chemotherapy) started triptorelin and had one or more samples drawn. With exemestane plus triptorelin, median reductions from baseline E2, E1, and E1S levels were consistently ≥ 95%, resulting in significantly lower levels than with tamoxifen plus triptorelin at all time points. Among patients on exemestane plus triptorelin, 25%, 24%, and 17% had an E2 level greater than 2.72 pg/mL at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Baseline factors related to on-treatment E2 level greater than 2.72 pg/mL were no prior chemotherapy (P = .06), higher body mass index (P = .05), and lower follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone (each P < .01).
During the first year, most patients on exemestane plus triptorelin had E2 levels below the defined threshold of 2.72 pg/mL, consistent with levels reported in postmenopausal patients on aromatase inhibitors, but at each time point, at least 17% of patients had levels greater than the threshold.
描述在使用曲普瑞林联合依西美坦或他莫昔芬的第一年中雌二醇(E2)、雌酮(E1)和硫酸雌酮(E1S)的水平,并评估接受依西美坦联合曲普瑞林治疗时可能出现的抑制不足情况。
参与卵巢功能抑制试验的绝经前早期乳腺癌患者,选择曲普瑞林作为卵巢抑制方法,并随机分配至依西美坦联合曲普瑞林组或他莫昔芬联合曲普瑞林组,直至达到120例患者的目标人群。采血时间点为0、3、6、12、18、24、36和48个月。采用高灵敏度和特异性的检测方法测定血清雌激素。这项预先计划的12个月分析评估了所有患者的E2、E1、E1S、促卵泡生成素和促黄体生成素水平,以及在依西美坦联合曲普瑞林治疗期间任何时间点E2水平大于2.72 pg/mL的患者比例。
116例患者(依西美坦组,n = 86;他莫昔芬组,n = 30;中位年龄44岁;中位E2为51 pg/mL;55%曾接受化疗)开始使用曲普瑞林并进行了一次或多次采血。使用依西美坦联合曲普瑞林时,E2、E1和E1S水平较基线的中位降幅始终≥95%,导致在所有时间点的水平均显著低于他莫昔芬联合曲普瑞林组。在依西美坦联合曲普瑞林治疗的患者中,分别有25%、24%和17%在3、6和12个月时E2水平大于2.72 pg/mL。与治疗期间E2水平大于2.72 pg/mL相关的基线因素包括未接受过化疗(P = 0.06)、较高的体重指数(P = 0.05)以及较低的促卵泡生成素和促黄体生成素水平(各P < 0.01)。
在第一年中,大多数接受依西美坦联合曲普瑞林治疗的患者E2水平低于2.72 pg/mL的定义阈值,这与绝经后接受芳香化酶抑制剂治疗患者的报告水平一致,但在每个时间点,至少17%的患者水平高于该阈值。