Suppr超能文献

来曲唑治疗局部晚期内分泌治疗敏感乳腺癌的绝经前患者中,新辅助地加瑞克与曲普瑞林的比较:一项随机 II 期试验。

Neoadjuvant Degarelix Versus Triptorelin in Premenopausal Patients Who Receive Letrozole for Locally Advanced Endocrine-Responsive Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial.

机构信息

1 IEO, European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Recovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.

2 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 10;37(5):386-395. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00296. Epub 2018 Dec 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Premenopausal women with stage cT2 to 4b, any N, M0; estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor greater than 50%; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to triptorelin 3.75 mg administered intramuscularly on day 1 of every cycle or degarelix 240 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 of cycle 1 then 80 mg SC on day 1 of cycles 2 through 6, both with letrozole 2.5 mg/day for six 28-day cycles. Surgery was performed 2 to 3 weeks after the last injection. Serum was collected at baseline, after 24 and 72 hours, at 7 and 14 days, and then before injections on cycles 2 through 6. The primary end point was time to optimal OFS (time from the first injection to first assessment of centrally assessed estradiol level ≤ 2.72 pg/mL [≤ 10 pmol/L] during neoadjuvant therapy). The trial had 90% power to detect a difference using a log-rank test with a two-sided α of .05. Secondary end points included response, tolerability, and patient-reported endocrine symptoms.

RESULTS

Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole). Time to optimal OFS was three times faster for patients assigned to degarelix and letrozole than to triptorelin and letrozole (median, 3 v 14 days; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.65 to 5.65; P < .001). Furthermore, OFS was maintained during subsequent cycles for all patients assigned to receive degarelix and letrozole, whereas 15.4% of patients assigned to receive triptorelin and letrozole had suboptimal OFS after cycle 1 (six events during 127 measurements). Adverse events as a result of both degarelix plus letrozole and triptorelin plus letrozole were as expected.

CONCLUSION

In premenopausal women receiving letrozole for neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, OFS was achieved more quickly and maintained more effectively with degarelix than with triptorelin.

摘要

目的

评估绝经前患者接受来曲唑新辅助内分泌治疗时,degarelix(一种促性腺激素释放激素[GnRH]拮抗剂)与 triptorelin(一种 GnRH 激动剂)在卵巢功能抑制(OFS)方面的作用。

方法

入组患者为 cT2 至 4b 期、任何 N、M0 的绝经前女性;雌激素受体和孕激素受体>50%;人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性乳腺癌。患者随机分配至 triptorelin 3.75mg 肌内注射,每周期第 1 天给药,或 degarelix 240mg 皮下注射(SC),第 1 周期第 1 天给药,然后第 2 至 6 周期第 1 天给药 80mg SC,均联合来曲唑 2.5mg/d 治疗 6 个 28 天周期。末次注射后 2 至 3 周进行手术。于基线时、注射后 24 和 72 小时、第 7 和 14 天以及第 2 至 6 周期注射前采集血清。主要终点为达到最佳 OFS 的时间(从第 1 次注射至新辅助治疗期间中心评估雌二醇水平≤2.72pg/mL[≤10pmol/L]的第 1 次评估时间)。该试验使用双侧 α 值为 0.05 的对数秩检验,有 90%的效能来检测差异。次要终点包括反应、耐受性和患者报告的内分泌症状。

结果

2014 年 2 月至 2017 年 1 月,共纳入 51 例患者(n=26 例接受 triptorelin+来曲唑治疗;n=25 例接受 degarelix+来曲唑治疗)。与接受 triptorelin+来曲唑治疗的患者相比,接受 degarelix+来曲唑治疗的患者达到最佳 OFS 的时间快 3 倍(中位时间:3 天比 14 天;风险比,3.05;95%CI,1.65 至 5.65;P<0.001)。此外,所有接受 degarelix+来曲唑治疗的患者在随后的周期中均维持了 OFS,而接受 triptorelin+来曲唑治疗的患者中有 15.4%在第 1 周期后 OFS 不佳(127 次测量中有 6 次)。degarelix+来曲唑和 triptorelin+来曲唑治疗的不良反应均在预期范围内。

结论

在接受来曲唑新辅助内分泌治疗的绝经前女性中,与 triptorelin 相比,degarelix 可更快地实现 OFS,且维持效果更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验