Luiz Fernando Lopes, Brazilian Society of Pediatric Oncology; Carla Renata Pacheco Donato Macedo, Instituto de Oncologia Pediatrica-GRAACC, Universidade Federal de São Paulo; Viviane Sonaglio, Hospital A.C. Camargo; Maria Teresa de Assis Almeida, Universidade de São Paulo, ITACI FMUSP; Maria Lydia Mello D'Andrea, Hospital Infantil Darcy Vargas; Renato Melaragno, Hospital Santa Marcelina; Sonia Maria Rossi Vianna, Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual; Paula Bruniera, Santa Casa de Misericordia de São Paulo, São Paulo; Luiz Fernando Lopes and Gisele Eiras Martins, Hospital de Cancer Infanto Juvenil de Barretos; Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira, Hospital de Cancer de Barretos, Barretos; Simone dos Santos Aguiar, Centro Infantil Boldrini & CIPED/FCM/Unicamp, Campinas; Marcelo Milone, Centro de Tratamento Fabiana Macedo de Morais/GACC, São Jose dos Campos; Jose Henrique S. Barreto, Hospital São Rafael/ONCO Bahia, Salvador; Eduardo Ribeiro Lima, Hospital da Baleia, Belo Horizonte; Paula Maria Azevedo Allemand Lopes, Hospital da Criança de Brasilia Jose Alencar, Brasilia; Flora Mitie Watanabe, Hospital Infantil Pequeno Principe; Mara Albonei Pianovski, Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Curitiba; and Mauber Eduardo Schultz Moreira, Hospital Universitario de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):603-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1420. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
We describe the results of a risk-adapted, response-based therapeutic approach from the Brazilian GCT-99 study on germ cell tumors.
From May 1999 to October 2009, 579 participants were enrolled in the Brazilian GCT-99 study. Treatment, defined as specific chemotherapy regimen and number of cycles, was allocated by means of risk-group assignment at diagnosis with consideration for stage and primary tumor site. Patients at low risk received no chemotherapy. Patients at intermediate risk (IR) with a good response (GR) received four cycles of platinum and etoposide (PE), for total doses of platinum 420 mg/m(2) and etoposide 2,040 mg/m(2). Patients at IR with a partial response (PR) received three cycles of PE plus three cycles of ifosfamide, vinblastine, and bleomycin. Patients at high risk (HR) with a GR received four cycles of PE and ifosfamide (PEI) at total doses of platinum 420 mg/m(2), etoposide 1,200 mg/m(2), and ifosfamide 30 g/m(2). Patients at HR with a PR received six cycles of PEI.
The risk-group distribution was 213 LR, 138 IR, and 129 HR for 480 evaluable patients. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates at 10 years were, respectively, 90% and 88.6% in the IR-GR group (n = 126) and 74.1% and 74.1% in the IR-PR group (n = 12). Ten-year rates for the HR-GR group (n = 86) were an OS of 66.8% and an EFS of 62.5%. The HR-PR group (n = 43) had an OS of 74.8% and an EFS of 73.4%. In univariable and multivariable analysis, increased serum lactate dehydrogenase level and histology for a metastatic immature teratoma were prognostic of a worsened outcome.
Reduction of therapy to two drugs did not compromise survival outcomes for patients in the IR-GR group, and escalation of therapy with PEI did not significantly improve OS and EFS in patients at HR.
我们描述了巴西 GCT-99 生殖细胞瘤研究中一种基于风险适应和反应的治疗方法的结果。
1999 年 5 月至 2009 年 10 月,579 名参与者参加了巴西 GCT-99 研究。治疗方法,即特定的化疗方案和周期数,是通过诊断时的风险组分配确定的,同时考虑了分期和原发肿瘤部位。低危患者不接受化疗。中危(IR)且有良好反应(GR)的患者接受四个周期的铂类和依托泊苷(PE)治疗,铂类总剂量为 420mg/m²,依托泊苷总剂量为 2040mg/m²。IR 且部分缓解(PR)的患者接受三个周期的 PE 加三个周期的异环磷酰胺、长春新碱和博来霉素。高危(HR)且有 GR 的患者接受四个周期的 PE 和异环磷酰胺(PEI)治疗,铂类总剂量为 420mg/m²,依托泊苷总剂量为 1200mg/m²,异环磷酰胺总剂量为 30g/m²。HR 且有 PR 的患者接受六个周期的 PEI 治疗。
480 名可评估患者的风险组分布为 213 名低危(LR)、138 名中危(IR)和 129 名高危(HR)。IR-GR 组(n=126)的总生存率(OS)和无事件生存率(EFS)分别为 10 年时的 90%和 88.6%,IR-PR 组(n=12)为 74.1%和 74.1%。HR-GR 组(n=86)的 10 年 OS 为 66.8%,EFS 为 62.5%。HR-PR 组(n=43)的 OS 为 74.8%,EFS 为 73.4%。单变量和多变量分析表明,血清乳酸脱氢酶水平升高和转移未成熟畸胎瘤的组织学类型与预后不良相关。
对于 IR-GR 组患者,将治疗药物减少至两种药物并未影响生存结果,而对于 HR 患者,用 PEI 进行治疗升级并未显著提高 OS 和 EFS。