Mackinnon S E, Dellon A L, O'Brien J P, Goldberg N, Hunter D A, Seiler W A, Carlton J
Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Plast Surg. 1989 Aug;23(2):129-34. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198908000-00006.
The traditional teaching that "nerve fibers are lost at the suture line" after a nerve repair was investigated by asking the question, "Can the number of nerve fibers distal to a nerve repair site be increased by increasing the number of nerve fibers proximally?" Ratios of proximal to distal nerve fibers were increased from 1:1 to 2.5:1 to 3.5:1 by suturing peroneal or posterior tibial or sciatic nerve proximally to peroneal nerve distally. At one year following the repair, distal nerve fiber numbers increased to twice normal as the ratio increased to 2.5:1, and then nerve fiber numbers plateaued. Nerve function, as judged by walking track analysis, was best in the peroneal:peroneal group (1:1 ratio), suggesting that appropriateness rather than number of proximal fibers was more critical in this nerve repair model.
通过提出“能否通过增加近端神经纤维的数量来增加神经修复部位远端的神经纤维数量?”这一问题,对“神经修复后神经纤维在缝合线处会丢失”这一传统学说进行了研究。通过将近端的腓总神经、胫后神经或坐骨神经与远端的腓总神经缝合,近端与远端神经纤维的比例从1:1增加到2.5:1再到3.5:1。修复后一年,随着比例增加到2.5:1,远端神经纤维数量增加到正常的两倍,然后神经纤维数量趋于稳定。通过行走轨迹分析判断,神经功能在腓总神经:腓总神经组(比例为1:1)中最佳,这表明在该神经修复模型中,近端纤维的适配性而非数量更为关键。