Milewski P J, Schofield P F
Department of Surgery, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Jul;71(4):253-9.
A total of 14 patients had operations for massive colonic haemorrhage. Of the seven who had a right hemicolectomy, four had the bleeding site localised, and three had only 'equivocal' indications of a right-sided source. One of these rebled 11 months later, but all survived and are well. Of the remaining patients, two had left-sided resection, one requiring an immediate second operation for rebleeding, and five, subtotal colectomy, of whom two died. A literature review confirms the suggestion that if the bleeding site has not been identified but, nevertheless, there are clues suggesting it to be right-sided, the best results will be obtained by right hemicolectomy. Left-sided resection should be used only when there is proof of left-sided bleeding, otherwise there will be an unacceptably high mortality. No clues, 'equivocal' indications of a left-sided source, or the presence of bilateral disease, should lead the operator to perform subtotal colectomy.
共有14例患者因大量结肠出血接受了手术。在接受右半结肠切除术的7例患者中,4例出血部位得以定位,3例仅有右侧出血来源的“不明确”指征。其中1例在11个月后再次出血,但所有患者均存活且情况良好。其余患者中,2例行左侧切除术,1例因再次出血需要立即进行二次手术,5例行结肠次全切除术,其中2例死亡。文献综述证实了以下观点:如果出血部位尚未确定,但有线索提示为右侧出血,那么右半结肠切除术将取得最佳效果。仅当有左侧出血的证据时才应进行左侧切除术,否则死亡率将高得令人无法接受。没有线索、左侧出血来源的“不明确”指征或双侧病变的存在,不应导致术者进行结肠次全切除术。