Akçay Erol, Van Cleve Jeremy
Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150085. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0085.
Inclusive fitness has been the cornerstone of social evolution theory for more than a half-century and has matured as a mathematical theory in the past 20 years. Yet surprisingly for a theory so central to an entire field, some of its connections to evolutionary theory more broadly remain contentious or underappreciated. In this paper, we aim to emphasize the connection between inclusive fitness and modern evolutionary theory through the following fact: inclusive fitness is simply classical Darwinian fitness, averaged over social, environmental and demographic states that members of a gene lineage experience. Therefore, inclusive fitness is neither a generalization of classical fitness, nor does it belong exclusively to the individual. Rather, the lineage perspective emphasizes that evolutionary success is determined by the effect of selection on all biological and environmental contexts that a lineage may experience. We argue that this understanding of inclusive fitness based on gene lineages provides the most illuminating and accurate picture and avoids pitfalls in interpretation and empirical applications of inclusive fitness theory.
半个多世纪以来,广义适合度一直是社会进化理论的基石,并在过去20年里发展成为一种数学理论。然而,令人惊讶的是,对于一个在整个领域中如此核心的理论,它与更广泛的进化理论之间的一些联系仍然存在争议或未得到充分认识。在本文中,我们旨在通过以下事实强调广义适合度与现代进化理论之间的联系:广义适合度仅仅是经典达尔文适合度,是对一个基因谱系的成员所经历的社会、环境和人口状态进行平均后的结果。因此,广义适合度既不是经典适合度的概括,也不完全属于个体。相反,谱系视角强调,进化成功是由选择对一个谱系可能经历的所有生物和环境背景的影响所决定的。我们认为,这种基于基因谱系对广义适合度的理解提供了最具启发性和准确性的图景,并避免了广义适合度理论在解释和实证应用中的陷阱。