Suppr超能文献

预测急性心力衰竭患者的死亡率:风险评分的作用。

Predicting mortality in patients with acute heart failure: Role of risk scores.

作者信息

Passantino Andrea, Monitillo Francesco, Iacoviello Massimo, Scrutinio Domenico

机构信息

Andrea Passantino, Domenico Scrutinio, Division of Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation, "S. Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Institute of Cassano Murge, 70020 Bari, Italy.

出版信息

World J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 26;7(12):902-11. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i12.902.

Abstract

Acute heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalization and death, and it is an increasing burden on health care systems. The correct risk stratification of patients could improve clinical outcome and resources allocation, avoiding the overtreatment of low-risk subjects or the early, inappropriate discharge of high-risk patients. Many clinical scores have been derived and validated for in-hospital and post-discharge survival; predictive models include demographic, clinical, hemodynamic and laboratory variables. Data sets are derived from public registries, clinical trials, and retrospective data. Most models show a good capacity to discriminate patients who reach major clinical end-points, with C-indices generally higher than 0.70, but their applicability in real-world populations has been seldom evaluated. No study has evaluated if the use of risk score-based stratification might improve patient outcome. Some variables (age, blood pressure, sodium concentration, renal function) recur in most scores and should always be considered when evaluating the risk of an individual patient hospitalized for acute heart failure. Future studies will evaluate the emerging role of plasma biomarkers.

摘要

急性心力衰竭是住院和死亡的主要原因,并且给医疗保健系统带来日益沉重的负担。对患者进行正确的风险分层可改善临床结局并优化资源分配,避免对低风险患者过度治疗或对高风险患者过早、不恰当地出院。许多临床评分已被推导并验证用于住院期间和出院后的生存情况;预测模型包括人口统计学、临床、血流动力学和实验室变量。数据集来自公共登记处、临床试验和回顾性数据。大多数模型显示出良好的区分达到主要临床终点患者的能力,C指数通常高于0.70,但它们在现实人群中的适用性很少得到评估。尚无研究评估基于风险评分的分层使用是否可能改善患者结局。一些变量(年龄、血压、钠浓度、肾功能)在大多数评分中反复出现,在评估因急性心力衰竭住院的个体患者风险时应始终予以考虑。未来的研究将评估血浆生物标志物的新作用。

相似文献

6
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
7
[Prognostic scores in intensive care].[重症监护中的预后评分]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Jun;46(6):471-80. doi: 10.1007/s001010050426.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验