• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉里萨心力衰竭风险评分分析:对单中心9207例因心力衰竭住院患者的预测价值

Analysis of the Larissa Heart Failure Risk Score: Predictive Value in 9207 Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure from a Single Center.

作者信息

Xanthopoulos Andrew, Skoularigis John, Briasoulis Alexandros, Magouliotis Dimitrios E, Zajichek Alex, Milinovich Alex, Kattan Michael W, Triposkiadis Filippos, Starling Randall C

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University General Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece.

Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 17;13(12):1721. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121721.

DOI:10.3390/jpm13121721
PMID:38138948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10744973/
Abstract

Early risk stratification is of outmost clinical importance in hospitalized patients with heart failure (HHF). We examined the predictive value of the Larissa Heart Failure Risk Score (LHFRS) in a large population of HHF patients from the Cleveland Clinic. A total of 13,309 admissions for heart failure (HF) from 9207 unique patients were extracted from the Cleveland Clinic's electronic health record system. For each admission, components of the 3-variable simple LHFRS were obtained, including hypertension history, myocardial infarction history, and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) ≥ 15%. The primary outcome was a HF readmission and/or all-cause mortality at one year, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality at one year of discharge. For both outcomes, all variables were statistically significant, and the Kaplan-Meier curves were well-separated and in a consistent order (Log-rank test -value < 0.001). Higher LHFRS values were found to be strongly related to patients experiencing an event, showing a clear association of LHFRS with this study outcomes. The bootstrapped-validated area under the curve (AUC) for the logistic regression model for each outcome revealed a C-index of 0.64 both for the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. LHFRS is a simple risk model and can be utilized as a basis for risk stratification in patients hospitalized for HF.

摘要

早期风险分层对于住院心力衰竭患者(HHF)具有至关重要的临床意义。我们在克利夫兰诊所的大量HHF患者群体中检验了拉里萨心力衰竭风险评分(LHFRS)的预测价值。从克利夫兰诊所的电子健康记录系统中提取了来自9207名独特患者的总共13309次心力衰竭(HF)住院记录。对于每次住院,获取了三变量简单LHFRS的组成部分,包括高血压病史、心肌梗死病史以及红细胞分布宽度(RDW)≥15%。主要结局是一年时的HF再入院和/或全因死亡率,次要结局是出院一年时的全因死亡率。对于这两个结局,所有变量均具有统计学意义,并且Kaplan-Meier曲线区分明显且顺序一致(对数秩检验P值<0.001)。发现较高的LHFRS值与发生事件的患者密切相关,表明LHFRS与本研究结局存在明确关联。每个结局的逻辑回归模型的自展验证曲线下面积(AUC)显示,主要结局和次要结局的C指数分别为0.64。LHFRS是一个简单的风险模型,可作为HF住院患者风险分层的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2706/10744973/40a6b56dedd0/jpm-13-01721-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2706/10744973/82b0cfc6d7aa/jpm-13-01721-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2706/10744973/8653e79a58e9/jpm-13-01721-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2706/10744973/3c3c0e306355/jpm-13-01721-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2706/10744973/40a6b56dedd0/jpm-13-01721-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2706/10744973/82b0cfc6d7aa/jpm-13-01721-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2706/10744973/8653e79a58e9/jpm-13-01721-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2706/10744973/3c3c0e306355/jpm-13-01721-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2706/10744973/40a6b56dedd0/jpm-13-01721-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of the Larissa Heart Failure Risk Score: Predictive Value in 9207 Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure from a Single Center.拉里萨心力衰竭风险评分分析:对单中心9207例因心力衰竭住院患者的预测价值
J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 17;13(12):1721. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121721.
2
Validation of the Larissa Heart Failure Risk Score for risk stratification in acute heart failure.用于急性心力衰竭风险分层的拉里萨心力衰竭风险评分的验证
Int J Cardiol. 2020 May 15;307:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.051. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
3
Larissa Heart Failure Risk Score and Mode of Death in Acute Heart Failure: Insights from REALITY-AHF.拉里萨心力衰竭风险评分与急性心力衰竭的死亡方式:来自REALITY-AHF研究的见解
J Clin Med. 2023 May 28;12(11):3722. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113722.
4
Risk prediction for 30-day heart failure-specific readmission or death after discharge: Data from the Korean Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) registry.出院后 30 天内心力衰竭特定再入院或死亡的风险预测:来自韩国急性心力衰竭(KorAHF)注册研究的数据。
J Cardiol. 2019 Feb;73(2):108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
Association of red cell distribution width with the risk of 3-month readmission in patients with heart failure: A retrospective cohort study.红细胞分布宽度与心力衰竭患者3个月再入院风险的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 7;10:1123905. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123905. eCollection 2023.
6
Prognostic value of RDW alone and in combination with NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure.红细胞分布宽度(RDW)单独及联合 N 末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)对心力衰竭患者的预后价值。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 Jul;45(7):802-813. doi: 10.1002/clc.23850. Epub 2022 May 27.
7
Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.心力衰竭风险分层与钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 5;140(19):1569-1577. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042685. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
8
Red blood cell distribution width in elderly hospitalized patients with cardiovascular disease.老年心血管疾病住院患者的红细胞分布宽度
World J Cardiol. 2021 Sep 26;13(9):503-513. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i9.503.
9
Red cell distribution width predicts mid-term prognosis in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure: the RDW in Acute Heart Failure (RE-AHF) study.红细胞分布宽度预测急性心力衰竭住院患者的中期预后:急性心力衰竭中红细胞分布宽度(RE-AHF)研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;14(2):239-247. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1958-z. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
10
Community-based care for the specialized management of heart failure: an evidence-based analysis.基于社区的心力衰竭专科管理:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(17):1-42. Epub 2009 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Models in Heart Failure: Hope or Hype?心力衰竭的预后模型:希望还是炒作?
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):345. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080345.

本文引用的文献

1
2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.《2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南》2023年聚焦更新
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3627-3639. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195.
2
The Prognostic Role of Spot Urinary Sodium and Chloride in a Cohort of Hospitalized Advanced Heart Failure Patients: A Pilot Study.即时尿钠和氯在一组住院晚期心力衰竭患者中的预后作用:一项初步研究。
Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 5;13(3):698. doi: 10.3390/life13030698.
3
Artificial Intelligence and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: All That Glitters is not Gold.
人工智能与心血管风险预测:闪光的未必都是金子。
Eur Cardiol. 2022 Dec 20;17:e29. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.11. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Predicting Six-Month Re-Admission Risk in Heart Failure Patients Using Multiple Machine Learning Methods: A Study Based on the Chinese Heart Failure Population Database.使用多种机器学习方法预测心力衰竭患者的六个月再入院风险:一项基于中国心力衰竭人群数据库的研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 21;12(3):870. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030870.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计数据-2023 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2023 Feb 21;147(8):e93-e621. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
6
Validation and derivation of short-term prognostic risk score in acute decompensated heart failure in China.中国急性失代偿性心力衰竭短期预后风险评分的验证和推导。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02743-1.
7
Prognostic risk scores for patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者的预后风险评分。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2022 May 2;83(5):1-16. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2021.0594. Epub 2022 May 6.
8
Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Heart Failure: Pathophysiology, Prognostic Role, Controversies and Dilemmas.心力衰竭中的红细胞分布宽度:病理生理学、预后作用、争议与困境
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 31;11(7):1951. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071951.
9
Predicting Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Acute Heart Failure by Using Machine Learning.运用机器学习预测急性心力衰竭患者的长期死亡率。
J Card Fail. 2022 Jul;28(7):1078-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
10
Endpoints in Heart Failure Drug Development.心力衰竭药物研发中的终点指标
Card Fail Rev. 2022 Jan 18;8:e01. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2021.13. eCollection 2022 Jan.