Walz Johanna M, Boehringer Daniel, Deissler Heidrun L, Faerber Lothar, Goepfert Jens C, Heiduschka Peter, Kleeberger Susannah M, Klettner Alexa, Krohne Tim U, Schneiderhan-Marra Nicole, Ziemssen Focke, Stahl Andreas
Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0145375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145375. eCollection 2016.
Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) is intensively investigated in various medical fields. However, comparing VEGF-A measurements is difficult because sample acquisition and pre-analytic procedures differ between studies. We therefore investigated which variables act as confounders of VEGF-A measurements.
Following a standardized protocol, blood was taken at three clinical sites from six healthy participants (one male and one female participant at each center) twice one week apart. The following pre-analytical parameters were varied in order to analyze their impact on VEGF-A measurements: analyzing center, anticoagulant (EDTA vs. PECT / CTAD), cannula (butterfly vs. neonatal), type of centrifuge (swing-out vs. fixed-angle), time before and after centrifugation, filling level (completely filled vs. half-filled tubes) and analyzing method (ELISA vs. multiplex bead array). Additionally, intrapersonal variations over time and sex differences were explored. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear regression model.
The following parameters were identified as statistically significant independent confounders of VEGF-A measurements: analyzing center, anticoagulant, centrifuge, analyzing method and sex of the proband. The following parameters were no significant confounders in our data set: intrapersonal variation over one week, cannula, time before and after centrifugation and filling level of collection tubes.
VEGF-A measurement results can be affected significantly by the identified pre-analytical parameters. We recommend the use of CTAD anticoagulant, a standardized type of centrifuge and one central laboratory using the same analyzing method for all samples.
血管内皮生长因子-A(VEGF-A)在各个医学领域都受到了深入研究。然而,由于不同研究之间样本采集和分析前程序存在差异,比较VEGF-A测量值很困难。因此,我们研究了哪些变量是VEGF-A测量的混杂因素。
按照标准化方案,在三个临床地点从六名健康参与者(每个中心一名男性和一名女性参与者)采集血液,两次采集间隔一周。为了分析以下分析前参数对VEGF-A测量的影响,对其进行了变化:分析中心、抗凝剂(乙二胺四乙酸[EDTA]与多聚乙二醇[PECT]/枸橼酸三钠-茶碱-腺苷-双嘧达莫[CTAD])、采血针(蝶形针与新生儿采血针)、离心机类型(摆动式与固定角度)、离心前后时间、填充水平(完全填充与半填充试管)和分析方法(酶联免疫吸附测定[ELISA]与多重微珠阵列)。此外,还探讨了个体随时间的变化和性别差异。使用线性回归模型进行统计分析。
以下参数被确定为VEGF-A测量的具有统计学意义的独立混杂因素:分析中心、抗凝剂、离心机、分析方法和先证者性别。以下参数在我们的数据集中不是显著的混杂因素:一周内的个体差异、采血针、离心前后时间和采集管的填充水平。
VEGF-A测量结果可能会受到已确定的分析前参数的显著影响。我们建议使用CTAD抗凝剂、标准化类型的离心机,并由一个中央实验室对所有样本使用相同的分析方法。