Mirimanoff René-Olivier
Clinique de La Source, Avenue Vinet 30, CH-1004 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chin Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;4(4):49. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3865.2015.12.05.
For stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), overall survival after surgery alone is quite poor, in the range of 5% to 10% at five years, mainly due to the high incidence of local and distant failures. Randomized trials and meta-analyses have shown a modest improvement in survival with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, however the local and distant failure rates remain high. Numerous retrospective studies and phase II trials have been published on the potential added value of radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting and are reviewed here. These studies have shown that the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy is followed by a high rate of complete resection, an encouraging rate of complete pathologic response, a high mediastinal clearance in case of N2 disease, all of which represent potential surrogates for survival. Until recently, only small randomized trials have compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and were not contributory. The recently published Swiss cooperative group (SAKK) phase III randomized trial is the only one to have accrued a sufficient number of patients for interpretation. It showed a superiority of neoadjuvant chemoradiation over neoadjuvant chemotherapy regarding overall response rate, complete resection rate and local control, with no increased haematologic toxicity or post-operative deaths. However there was no difference in the event-free survival (the primary endpoint) nor in overall survival between the two arms. Following the results of this trial, opposite opinions have been expressed regarding the possible causes of failures of this trial, and on the future role or not of radiotherapy associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery. It is suggested that under certain conditions, in which the risk of local failures is quite high after surgery, studies on the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiation should be pursued, using novel radiotherapy techniques and schemes, and novel systemic treatments associated with radiotherapy.
对于Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),单纯手术后的总生存率相当低,五年生存率在5%至10%之间,主要原因是局部和远处复发的发生率很高。随机试验和荟萃分析表明,新辅助化疗可使生存率略有提高,然而局部和远处复发率仍然很高。关于放疗在新辅助治疗中的潜在附加价值,已有大量回顾性研究和Ⅱ期试验发表,本文将对此进行综述。这些研究表明,化疗联合放疗后完全切除率高、病理完全缓解率令人鼓舞、N2期疾病的纵隔清除率高,所有这些都代表了生存的潜在替代指标。直到最近,只有小型随机试验比较了新辅助放化疗与新辅助化疗,但并无定论。最近发表的瑞士协作组(SAKK)Ⅲ期随机试验是唯一一项纳入足够数量患者以进行解读的试验。该试验表明,在总缓解率、完全切除率和局部控制方面,新辅助放化疗优于新辅助化疗,且血液学毒性或术后死亡并未增加。然而,两组之间的无事件生存(主要终点)和总生存并无差异。基于该试验结果,对于该试验失败的可能原因以及术前新辅助化疗联合放疗未来是否有作用,出现了相反的观点。有人认为,在某些条件下,即手术后局部复发风险相当高的情况下,应采用新的放疗技术和方案以及与放疗相关的新的全身治疗方法,继续开展关于新辅助放化疗作用的研究。