Fichou Yann, Le Maréchal Cédric, Scotet Virginie, Jamet Déborah, Férec Claude
French Blood Institute (EFS-Bretagne), Brest, France; National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm, UMR1078), Brest, France.
French Blood Institute (EFS-Bretagne), Brest, France; National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm, UMR1078), Brest, France; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France; Molecular Genetics and Histocompatibility Laboratory, Regional University Hospital (CHRU), Morvan Hospital, Brest, France.
Transfus Med Hemother. 2015 Nov;42(6):372-7. doi: 10.1159/000382086. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
Although systematic blood group genotyping of patients/donors is virtually possible, serological studies remain the gold standard to identify samples of clinical interest that may be further genotyped. In this context, we sought to identify variant D alleles that are likely to be clinically relevant in terms of other Rh antigens in a subset of population genotyped in Western France.
Samples presenting with the RHD*weak D type 4.2.2 allele (n = 47) were selected for the study. RHCE exons 1-7 were directly sequenced, and expression of Rh antigens was predicted on the basis of the molecular data.
Of the 47 samples tested, 19 (40.4%) were predicted to be of potential clinical interest. Moreover, we could show that selecting the samples to be genotyped by the nature of their variant D allele (i.e., RHD*weak D type 4.2.2 allele) rather than by their Duffy-null status appears to increase significantly the likelihood of identifying clinically relevant individuals for Rh status.
On the basis of our findings we suggest that all individuals genotyped as weak D type 4.2.2 should be systematically screened for RHCE variants by molecular analysis on a routine basis.
尽管对患者/供体进行系统的血型基因分型实际上是可行的,但血清学研究仍然是鉴定可能需要进一步进行基因分型的具有临床意义样本的金标准。在此背景下,我们试图在法国西部进行基因分型的一部分人群中,鉴定在其他Rh抗原方面可能具有临床相关性的D等位基因变体。
选择携带RHD*弱D型4.2.2等位基因的样本(n = 47)进行研究。对RHCE外显子1 - 7进行直接测序,并根据分子数据预测Rh抗原的表达。
在检测的47个样本中,19个(40.4%)被预测具有潜在的临床意义。此外,我们可以证明,根据变体D等位基因的性质(即RHD*弱D型4.2.2等位基因)而非其杜菲阴性状态来选择进行基因分型的样本,似乎能显著提高识别Rh血型状态具有临床相关性个体的可能性。
基于我们的研究结果,我们建议对所有基因分型为弱D型4.2.2的个体,应定期通过分子分析系统筛查RHCE变体。