Salinas Francis V
From the Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):261-74. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000336.
This article reviews and summarizes randomized controlled studies that have investigated ultrasound guidance (USG) for lower-extremity peripheral nerve blocks in comparison with other peripheral nerve localization techniques and those that compared different ultrasound-guided techniques investigating optimal perineural local anesthetic distribution patterns.Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria (minimum Jadad score 3), and 10 additional studies directly compared USG with peripheral nerve stimulation, and 5 additional studies directly compared USG with landmark-based field blocks. Fourteen studies compared different local anesthetic distribution parameters.Analysis of the literature supports the use of USG for decreased block performance time, decreased block onset time, increased rate of complete sensory block, and increased analgesic efficacy. Ultrasound was never inferior to peripheral nerve stimulation. The research focus has evolved during the last 5 years into investigating optimal ultrasound-guided techniques.
本文回顾并总结了一些随机对照研究,这些研究将超声引导(USG)用于下肢周围神经阻滞,并与其他周围神经定位技术进行了比较,还包括那些比较不同超声引导技术以研究最佳神经周围局麻药分布模式的研究。34项研究符合纳入标准(最低Jadad评分3分),另有10项研究直接将超声引导与周围神经刺激进行了比较,还有5项研究直接将超声引导与基于体表标志的区域阻滞进行了比较。14项研究比较了不同的局麻药分布参数。文献分析支持使用超声引导来缩短阻滞操作时间、缩短阻滞起效时间、提高完全感觉阻滞率以及增强镇痛效果。超声引导从未劣于周围神经刺激。在过去5年中,研究重点已发展为探究最佳超声引导技术。