Bagby G J, Thompson J J, Wilson L A, Hazel R M
Department of Physiology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans 70112.
Circ Shock. 1989 Aug;28(4):385-94.
This study was initiated to compare the temporal response of serum lipoprotein lipase-suppressing mediator (LSM) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) -infused or -injected rats. Serial blood samples were obtained over a 5-day period from rats implanted with vascular catheters. Control rats infused with saline exhibited no detectable LSM activity during the 5-day observation period. LPS administered either by injection or infusion (6 h or 5 d) resulted in detection of serum LSM and TNF activities during the early period of observation with the LSM temporal response (8 h) outlasting the TNF response (3 h). The LSM response lasted a little longer in LPS-infused rats than it did in injected rats, but in each case LSM activity was not detected in serum samples collected at or after 12 h post-LPS. Neither the duration nor the magnitude of the TNF response differed between LPS-infused vs. -injected rats. Despite similarities in the LSM and TNF pattern in all rats receiving LPS, lethality was greater in LPS-infused animals than it was in LPS-injected rats. The results indicate that differences in lethality between LPS-injected and -infused rats cannot be explained solely by a differential response of serum TNF.
本研究旨在比较脂多糖(LPS)注入或注射的大鼠血清脂蛋白脂肪酶抑制介质(LSM)和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)的时间反应。在5天时间内,从植入血管导管的大鼠获取系列血样。注入生理盐水的对照大鼠在5天观察期内未检测到LSM活性。通过注射或注入(6小时或5天)给予LPS,导致在观察早期检测到血清LSM和TNF活性,LSM的时间反应(8小时)比TNF反应(3小时)持续时间长。LPS注入的大鼠中LSM反应持续时间比注射的大鼠稍长,但在每种情况下,LPS后12小时或之后采集的血清样本中均未检测到LSM活性。LPS注入与注射的大鼠之间,TNF反应的持续时间和幅度均无差异。尽管所有接受LPS的大鼠中LSM和TNF模式相似,但LPS注入的动物的致死率高于LPS注射的大鼠。结果表明,LPS注射和注入的大鼠之间致死率的差异不能仅由血清TNF的差异反应来解释。