Atoufi B, Kamavuako E N, Hudgins B, Englehart K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015 Aug;2015:1663-6. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318695.
Muscle synergies have been proposed as a way for the central nervous system (CNS) to simplify the generation of motor commands and they have been shown to explain a large portion of the variation in the muscle patterns across a variety of conditions. However, whether human subjects are able to control prostheses proportionally with a small set of synergies has not been tested directly. Here we investigated if muscle synergies can be used to identify different wrist and hand motions. We recorded electromyographic (EMG) activity from eight arm muscles while the subjects exerted seven different intensity levels during the motions when performing seven classes of hand and wrist motion. From these data we extracted the muscle synergies and classified the tasks associated to each contraction intensity profile by linear discriminant analysis (LDA). We compared the performance obtained using muscle synergies with the performance of using the mean absolute values (MAV) as a feature. Also, the consistency of extracted muscle synergies was studied across intensity variations. While the synergies showed relative consistency particularly across closer intensity levels, average classification results generated with the synergies were less accurate than MAVs. These results indicate that although the performance of muscle synergies was very close to MAVs, they do not provide additional information for task identification across different exerted intensity levels.
肌肉协同作用被认为是中枢神经系统(CNS)简化运动指令生成的一种方式,并且已被证明可以解释在各种条件下肌肉模式变化的很大一部分。然而,人类受试者是否能够通过一小部分协同作用按比例控制假肢尚未得到直接测试。在这里,我们研究了肌肉协同作用是否可用于识别不同的手腕和手部动作。我们记录了八块手臂肌肉的肌电图(EMG)活动,受试者在执行七类手部和手腕动作时,在动作过程中施加了七种不同的强度水平。从这些数据中,我们提取了肌肉协同作用,并通过线性判别分析(LDA)对与每个收缩强度分布相关的任务进行了分类。我们将使用肌肉协同作用获得的性能与使用平均绝对值(MAV)作为特征的性能进行了比较。此外,还研究了提取的肌肉协同作用在强度变化中的一致性。虽然协同作用显示出相对一致性,特别是在更接近的强度水平之间,但协同作用产生的平均分类结果不如MAV准确。这些结果表明,尽管肌肉协同作用的性能与MAV非常接近,但它们并不能为跨不同施加强度水平的任务识别提供额外信息。