Kalev K, Bachmann M, Orgo L, Lass J, Hinrikus H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:4158-61. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319310.
There is a high demand for objective indicators in diagnosis of depression as diagnosis of depression is still based on psychiatrist's subjective judgment. A nonlinear method Lempel Ziv Complexity (LZC) has been previously successfully used for detection of neuronal or mental disorders based on electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. However, the method overlooks the high frequency content of EEG signals. Therefore, this study is aimed to find out whether the use of Multiscale Lempel Ziv Complexity (MLZC), considering also high frequencies, could overcome the limitations of LZC and better differentiate depression. In current study the EEG recordings were carried out on the groups of depressive and healthy subjects of 11 volunteers each. The LZC and MLZC were calculated on resting EEG signals in eyes open condition from 30 channels at a length of 2 minutes. The results revealed the incapability of traditional LZC to differentiate depressive subjects from healthy controls in eyes open condition, while MLZC differentiated two groups in numerous channels at different frequencies, giving the highest classification accuracy in channel F3 (86 %) at frequencies 9 and 15.5 Hz. The results indicate that the high frequency information, which is lost in calculation of traditional LZC, has a great value in differentiating between depressive and control groups.
由于抑郁症的诊断仍基于精神科医生的主观判断,因此对抑郁症诊断中的客观指标有很高的需求。一种非线性方法——莱普尔·齐夫复杂度(LZC)此前已成功用于基于脑电图(EEG)信号检测神经元或精神障碍。然而,该方法忽略了EEG信号的高频成分。因此,本研究旨在探讨使用多尺度莱普尔·齐夫复杂度(MLZC),同时考虑高频成分,是否能够克服LZC的局限性并更好地区分抑郁症。在当前研究中,对每组11名志愿者的抑郁症患者和健康受试者进行了EEG记录。在睁眼状态下,从30个通道采集2分钟时长的静息EEG信号,并计算其LZC和MLZC。结果显示,传统的LZC在睁眼状态下无法区分抑郁症患者和健康对照,而MLZC在不同频率的多个通道中区分了两组,在通道F3中,9 Hz和15.5 Hz频率下的分类准确率最高,为86%。结果表明,在传统LZC计算中丢失的高频信息在区分抑郁症组和对照组方面具有重要价值。