Time for a prepublication culture in clinical research?
作者信息
Lauer Michael S, Krumholz Harlan M, Topol Eric J
机构信息
Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
出版信息
Lancet. 2015 Dec 19;386(10012):2447-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01177-0. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Time for a prepublication culture in clinical research?临床研究是否到了建立预发表文化的时候？
Lancet. 2015 Dec 19;386(10012):2447-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01177-0. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
2
Brain. Editorial.《大脑》。社论。
Brain. 2012 Apr;135(Pt 4):989-91. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws081.
3
Prepublication culture in clinical research.临床研究中的预发表文化。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 20;387(10020):750. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00330-5. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
4
Cardiovascular pathology: looking back on the first 25 years and forward into the future.心血管病理学：回顾头25年并展望未来。
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2016 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2015.11.002.
5
On the 60th anniversary of Neurology®.在《神经病学》杂志创刊60周年之际。
Neurology. 2011 Jun 7;76(23):1950-1. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182228486.
6
Brain. Editorial.《大脑》。社论。
Brain. 2012 Jun;135(Pt 6):1655-7. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws139.
7
Editorial.
J Biochem. 2018 Jan 1;163(1):1. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvx088.
8
Editorial: Retrospectives - lives behind the science.
FEMS Yeast Res. 2016 Mar;16(2):fow005. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fow005. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
9
Nature Neuroscience turns 10.《自然·神经科学》创刊十周年。
Nat Neurosci. 2008 May;11(5):521. doi: 10.1038/nn0508-521.
10
Acta Histochemica celebrates 60 years of publication (1954-2014).《组织化学学报》迎来创刊60周年（1954 - 2014年）。
Acta Histochem. 2014 Jan;116(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
引用本文的文献
1
Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review.新冠病毒19临床试验预印本与已发表报告的一致性及其对决策的影响：回顾性审查
BMJ Med. 2022 Oct 3;1(1):e000309. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000309. eCollection 2022.
2
Biomedical Research COVID-19 Impact Assessment: Lessons Learned and Compelling Needs.生物医学研究中的 COVID-19 影响评估：经验教训与迫切需求
NAM Perspect. 2021 Jul 26;2021. doi: 10.31478/202107e. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature.比较生物医学文献中预印本和同行评审文章的报告质量。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020 Dec 1;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3.
4
Inflection Point: Ideas for Accelerating Breakthroughs and Improving Cardiovascular Health.转折点：加速突破与改善心血管健康的理念
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Dec;13(12):e007615. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007615. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
5
Submissions and Downloads of Preprints in the First Year of medRxiv.预印本在 medRxiv 上线首年的提交和下载情况。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 10;324(18):1903-1905. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17529.
6
Preprints and Scholarly Communication: Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers.预印本与学术交流：采用情况、实践、驱动因素与障碍
F1000Res. 2019 Jun 26;8:971. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19619.2. eCollection 2019.
7
Social Media and the Dissemination of Prepublication Data in Surgical Fields.社交媒体与外科领域预发表数据的传播
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Jun 19;7(6):e2303. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002303. eCollection 2019 Jun.
8
Submissions from the SPRINT Data Analysis Challenge on clinical risk prediction: a cross-sectional evaluation.SPRINT 数据分析挑战赛关于临床风险预测的提交结果：一项横断面评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e025936. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025936.
9
Delays in the Publication of Important Clinical Trial Findings in Oncology.肿瘤学中重要临床试验结果发表的延迟。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 12;4(7):e180264. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0264.
10
Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science.预印本：加速暴发科学研究的未充分利用机制。
PLoS Med. 2018 Apr 3;15(4):e1002549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002549. eCollection 2018 Apr.
本文引用的文献
1
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
2
Accelerating scientific publication in biology.加速生物学领域的科学出版物发表。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3;112(44):13439-46. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511912112. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
3
Research groups: How big should they be?研究团队：规模应该有多大？
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 9;3:e989. doi: 10.7717/peerj.989. eCollection 2015.
4
Gap between science and media revisited: scientists as public communicators.科学与媒体之间的差距再探讨：科学家作为公众传播者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14102-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212745110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
The case for open preprints in biology.生物学中开放预印本的案例。
PLoS Biol. 2013;11(5):e1001563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001563. Epub 2013 May 14.
6
Ushering in a new era of open science through data sharing: the wall must come down.通过数据共享迎来开放科学的新时代：必须推倒这堵墙。
JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1355-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.1299.
7
The Internet and the Journal.
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jun 22;332(25):1709-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199506223322509.
8
The Ingelfinger Rule.英格芬格规则。
N Engl J Med. 1981 Oct 1;305(14):824-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198110013051408.
9
Definition of "sole contribution".“唯一贡献”的定义。
N Engl J Med. 1969 Sep 18;281(12):676-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196909182811208.
10
The Ingelfinger Rule revisited.再谈英格尔芬格规则。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Nov 7;325(19):1371-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199111073251910.
Zotero 插件