Serra Carla, Pallotti Francesca, Bortolotti Mauro, Caputo Carla, Felicani Cristina, De Giorgio Roberto, Barbara Giovanni, Nardi Elena, Labate Antonio Maria Morselli
Department of Digestive System, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital and University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (C.S., F.P., M.B., C.C., C.F., R.D.G., G.B.); and Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.N., A.M.M.L.).
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Feb;35(2):297-304. doi: 10.7863/ultra.14.10033. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
The purpose of this study was to compare conventional 2-dimensional (2D) B-mode sonography with 3-dimensional (3D) sonography for assessing gallbladder volume and contractility.
Gallbladder volume and contractility were evaluated in 32 healthy volunteers after fasting and abstinence from smoking for 8 hours and after a standardized balanced liquid meal. The gallbladder was evaluated with 2D sonography (with the use of the ellipsoid method) and with 3D sonography using a volumetric matrix probe. Both measurements were made by an operator who was skilled in sonography and an unskilled operator. The group of volunteers was subdivided into 2 subgroups including 16 participants, which represented the "2 moments" of acquisition by the techniques, particularly for the unskilled operator.
The postprandial volumes obtained with 3D sonography were significantly lower in comparison to the volumes obtained with 2D sonography (P= .013), and there was a significant difference between the measurements made by the skilled and unskilled operators only for 2D sonography (P< .001), whereas between the 2 moments of acquisition by the 3D technique, there was no significant difference. The reproducibility of the technique for evaluation of gallbladder volumes was higher for 3D sonography than 2D sonography, particularly for the postprandial evaluation.
The new 3D sonographic method using a volumetric matrix probe is a simple, reliable, and more reproducible technique than conventional 2D sonography, even if performed by an unskilled operator, and it allows a reliable stimulation test for a gallbladder dynamic study.
本研究旨在比较传统二维(2D)B型超声与三维(3D)超声在评估胆囊容积和收缩功能方面的差异。
对32名健康志愿者进行研究,他们在禁食8小时且禁烟后,先接受标准平衡流食餐,然后分别用二维超声(采用椭圆体法)和三维超声容积矩阵探头评估胆囊容积和收缩功能。两项测量均由一名熟练的超声操作员和一名非熟练的操作员进行。志愿者组被分为两个亚组,每组16人,分别代表两种技术采集数据的“两个时刻”,尤其针对非熟练操作员。
与二维超声测量的容积相比,三维超声测量的餐后胆囊容积显著更低(P = 0.013),并且仅二维超声测量中熟练与非熟练操作员的测量结果存在显著差异(P < 0.001),而三维技术采集数据的两个时刻之间无显著差异。三维超声评估胆囊容积的技术重复性高于二维超声,尤其是餐后评估。
即使由非熟练操作员操作,使用容积矩阵探头的新型三维超声方法也是一种比传统二维超声更简单、可靠且重复性更高的技术,并且它能为胆囊动态研究提供可靠的刺激试验。