Suppr超能文献

上皮膜抗原对恶性胸腔积液的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of epithelial membrane antigen for malignant effusions: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Lin Wentao, Liu Xiaoxue, Cen Ying

机构信息

Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan - China.

出版信息

Int J Biol Markers. 2016 Feb 29;31(1):e11-6. doi: 10.5301/jbm.5000181.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Body cavity fluid examination sometimes presents a diagnostic challenge in cytology practice. This meta-analysis was undertaken to comprehensively assess the diagnostic potential of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) in malignant effusions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All relevant original articles about EMA in the diagnosis of malignant effusions published up to July 1, 2014 were retrieved. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were pooled to evaluate the diagnostic value of EMA for malignant effusions using the Meta-Disc 1.4 and STATA 12.0 statistical software.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis and the summary estimates for EMA in the diagnosis of malignant effusions were as follows: sensitivity 0.9 (95% CI 0.83-0.87), specificity 0.87 (95% CI 0.96-0.99), positive likelihood ratio 5.8 (95% CI 15.59-36.37), negative likelihood ratio 0.15 (95% CI 0.07-0.20) and diagnostic odds ratio 52.63 (95% CI 20.91-132.49). The SROC curve indicated that the maximum joint sensitivity and specificity (Q-value) was 0.88; the area under the curve was 0.94.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis indicated that EMA may be a useful diagnostic tool with good sensitivity and specificity for differentiating malignant effusions from benign effusions.

摘要

背景与目的

体腔液检查在细胞学实践中有时会带来诊断挑战。本荟萃分析旨在全面评估上皮膜抗原(EMA)在恶性积液诊断中的潜力。

材料与方法

检索截至2014年7月1日发表的所有关于EMA诊断恶性积液的相关原始文章。使用Meta-Disc 1.4和STATA 12.0统计软件汇总总体敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比、诊断比值比以及汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线,以评估EMA对恶性积液的诊断价值。

结果

11项研究符合荟萃分析的纳入标准,EMA诊断恶性积液的汇总估计如下:敏感性0.9(95%可信区间0.83 - 0.87),特异性0.87(95%可信区间0.96 - 0.99),阳性似然比5.8(95%可信区间15.59 - 36.37),阴性似然比0.15(95%可信区间0.07 - 0.20),诊断比值比52.63(95%可信区间20.91 - 132.49)。SROC曲线表明,最大联合敏感性和特异性(Q值)为0.88;曲线下面积为0.94。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,EMA可能是一种有用的诊断工具,在区分恶性积液和良性积液方面具有良好的敏感性和特异性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验