Suppr超能文献

养老院收养与养老院质量

Green House Adoption and Nursing Home Quality.

作者信息

Afendulis Christopher C, Caudry Daryl J, O'Malley A James, Kemper Peter, Grabowski David C

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Geisel School of Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):454-74. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12436. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of the Green House (GH) model on nursing home resident-level quality of care measures.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Resident-level minimum data set (MDS) assessments merged with Medicare inpatient claims for the period 2005 through 2010.

STUDY DESIGN

Using a difference-in-differences framework, we compared changes in care quality and outcomes in 15 nursing homes that adopted the GH model relative to changes over the same time period in 223 matched nursing homes that had not adopted the GH model.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

For individuals residing in GH homes, adoption of the model lowered readmissions and several MDS measures of poor quality, including bedfast residents, catheter use, and pressure ulcers, but these results were not present across the entire GH organization, suggesting possible offsetting effects for residents of non-GH "legacy" units within the GH organization.

CONCLUSIONS

GH adoption led to improvement in rehospitalizations and certain nursing home quality measures for individuals residing in a GH home. The absence of evidence of a decline in other clinical quality measures in GH nursing homes should reassure anyone concerned that GH might have sacrificed clinical quality for improved quality of life.

摘要

目的

评估“绿屋”(GH)模式对疗养院居民层面护理质量指标的影响。

数据来源/研究背景:2005年至2010年期间居民层面的最低数据集(MDS)评估与医疗保险住院理赔数据合并。

研究设计

采用双重差分框架,我们比较了15家采用GH模式的疗养院护理质量和结果的变化,以及223家同期未采用GH模式的匹配疗养院的变化情况。

主要发现

对于居住在GH疗养院的个体,该模式的采用降低了再入院率以及多项质量不佳的MDS指标,包括卧床不起的居民、导尿管使用和压疮情况,但这些结果在整个GH机构中并不普遍,这表明GH机构内非GH“传统”单元的居民可能存在抵消效应。

结论

采用GH模式使居住在GH疗养院的个体的再入院率和某些疗养院质量指标得到改善。GH疗养院没有其他临床质量指标下降的证据,这应能让任何担心GH可能为改善生活质量而牺牲临床质量的人放心。

相似文献

1
Green House Adoption and Nursing Home Quality.养老院收养与养老院质量
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):454-74. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12436. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
2
The Impact of Green House Adoption on Medicare Spending and Utilization.采用温室对医疗保险支出和使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):433-53. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12438. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
4
The Green House Model of Nursing Home Care in Design and Implementation.养老院护理的温室模式:设计与实施
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):352-77. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12418. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
7
Culture change and nursing home quality of care.文化变革与养老院护理质量。
Gerontologist. 2014 Feb;54 Suppl 1:S35-45. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt143.
10
Sustaining Culture Change: Experiences in the Green House Model.维持文化变革:温室模式中的经验
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):398-417. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12428. Epub 2015 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

4
Putting the Nursing and Home in Nursing Homes.将护理融入养老院之中。
Innov Aging. 2022 Apr 29;6(4):igac029. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac029. eCollection 2022.
7

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Green House Adoption on Medicare Spending and Utilization.采用温室对医疗保险支出和使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):433-53. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12438. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
2
Sustaining Culture Change: Experiences in the Green House Model.维持文化变革:温室模式中的经验
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):398-417. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12428. Epub 2015 Dec 27.
4
The Green House Model of Nursing Home Care in Design and Implementation.养老院护理的温室模式:设计与实施
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):352-77. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12418. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
9
Culture change and nursing home quality of care.文化变革与养老院护理质量。
Gerontologist. 2014 Feb;54 Suppl 1:S35-45. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt143.
10
Specialization in medicine: how much is appropriate?
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):463-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.44.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验