Suppr超能文献

非传统小型养老院的 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数较少。

Nontraditional Small House Nursing Homes Have Fewer COVID-19 Cases and Deaths.

机构信息

The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

The Green House Project, Linthicum, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Mar;22(3):489-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.01.069. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Green House and other small nursing home (NH) models are considered "nontraditional" due to their size (10-12 beds), universal caregivers, and other home-like features. They have garnered great interest regarding their potential benefit to limit Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections due to fewer people living, working, visiting, and being admitted to Green House/small NHs, and private rooms and bathrooms, but this assumption has not been tested. If they prove advantageous compared with other NHs, they may constitute an especially promising model as policy makers and providers reinvent NHs post-COVID.

DESIGN

This cohort study compared rates of COVID-19 infections, COVID-19 admissions/readmissions, and COVID-19 mortality, among Green House/small NHs with rates in other NHs between January 20, 2020 and July 31, 2020.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

All Green House homes that held a skilled nursing license and received Medicaid or Medicare payment were invited to participate; other small NHs that replicate Green House physical design and operational practices were eligible if they had the same licensure and payer sources. Of 57 organizations, 43 (75%) provided complete data, which included 219 NHs. Comparison NHs (referred to as "traditional NHs") were up to 5 most geographically proximate NHs within 100 miles that had <50 beds and ≥50 beds for which data were available from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Because Department of Veterans Affairs organizations are not required to report to CMS, they were not included.

METHODS

Rates per 1000 resident days were derived for COVID-19 cases and admissions, and per 100 COVID-19 positive cases for mortality. A log-rank test compared rates between Green House/small NHs and traditional NHs with <50 beds and ≥50 beds.

RESULTS

Rates of all outcomes were significantly lower in Green House/small NHs than in traditional NHs that had <50 beds and ≥50 beds (log-rank test P < .025 for all comparisons). The median (middle value) rates of COVID-19 cases per 1000 resident days were 0 in both Green House/small NHs and NHs <50 beds, while they were 0.06 in NHs ≥50 beds; in terms of COVID-19 mortality, the median rates per 100 positive residents were 0 (Green House/small NHs), 10 (<50 beds), and 12.5 (≥50 beds). Differences were most marked in the highest quartile: 25% of Green House/small NHs had COVID-19 case rates per 1000 resident days higher than 0.08, with the corresponding figures for other NHs being 0.15 (<50 beds) and 0.74 (≥50 beds).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates are less in Green House/small NHs than rates in traditional NHs with <50 and ≥50 beds, especially among the higher and extreme values. Green House/small NHs are a promising model of care as NHs are reinvented post-COVID.

摘要

目的

由于规模(10-12 张床位)、通用护理人员和其他类似家庭的特点,温室和其他小型养老院(NH)模式被认为是“非传统”的。由于居住、工作、探视和入住温室/小型 NH 的人数较少,以及私人房间和浴室,它们在限制 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染方面具有很大的优势,因此引起了极大的兴趣,但这一假设尚未得到验证。如果它们与其他 NH 相比具有优势,那么它们可能是一个特别有前途的模式,因为政策制定者和提供者正在为 COVID 后重新设计 NH。

设计

这项队列研究比较了 2020 年 1 月 20 日至 2020 年 7 月 31 日期间,温室/小型 NH 与其他 NH 之间 COVID-19 感染、COVID-19 入院/再入院和 COVID-19 死亡率的发生率。

地点和参与者

所有持有熟练护理许可证并接受医疗补助或医疗保险支付的温室住宅都被邀请参加;如果其他小型 NH 复制了温室的物理设计和运营实践,并且具有相同的许可和支付来源,则符合条件。在 57 个组织中,有 43 个(75%)提供了完整的数据,其中包括 219 个 NH。对照 NH(称为“传统 NH”)是在 100 英里内最多有 50 张床位和<50 张床位的 5 个最接近的 NH,并且可以从医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)获得数据。由于退伍军人事务部组织不需要向 CMS 报告,因此不包括在内。

方法

每 1000 名居民日的 COVID-19 病例和入院率以及每 100 例 COVID-19 阳性病例的死亡率均为每 100 例阳性病例的死亡率。对数秩检验比较了温室/小型 NH 与床位<50 张和床位≥50 张的传统 NH 之间的比率。

结果

温室/小型 NH 的所有结果发生率均明显低于床位<50 张和床位≥50 张的传统 NH(对数秩检验 P<.025 所有比较)。每 1000 名居民日 COVID-19 病例的中位数(中间值)率在温室/小型 NH 和床位<50 张的 NH 中均为 0,而床位≥50 张的 NH 中为 0.06;就 COVID-19 死亡率而言,每 100 名阳性居民的中位数率为 0(温室/小型 NH),10(床位<50 张)和 12.5(床位≥50 张)。在最高四分位数中差异最为明显:温室/小型 NH 中有 25%的 COVID-19 病例率每 1000 名居民日高于 0.08,而其他 NH 的相应数字为 0.15(床位<50 张)和 0.74(床位≥50 张)。

结论和意义

与床位<50 张和床位≥50 张的传统 NH 相比,温室/小型 NH 的 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率较低,尤其是在较高和极端值中。温室/小型 NH 是 COVID 后 NH 重新设计的有前途的护理模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d067/7835101/75768b8837d7/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验