Thibault-Gagnon Stéphanie, Morin Mélanie
School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
J Sex Med. 2015 Nov;12(11):2178-89. doi: 10.1111/jsm.13028.
Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) dysfunctions, especially elevated tone or tension, are suggested to play an important role in the pathophysiology of provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). However, the involvement of the PFMs remains misunderstood as the assessment of muscle tone is complex and requires a thorough understanding of muscle physiology in relation to the characteristics and limitations of current PFM assessment tools. The aim of this review was to describe the structures and mechanisms involved in muscle tone in normally innervated muscle, and to discuss and relate these concepts to the PFM findings in women with PVD.
A narrative overview of the literature retrieved from searches of electronic databases and hand searches.
Muscle tone in a normally innervated muscle comprises both active (contractile) and passive (viscoelastic) components. Current methods for evaluating PFM tone such as digital palpation, ultrasound imaging, pressure perineometry, dynamometry, and electromyography may evaluate different components. Research findings suggestive of PFM hypertonicity in women with PVD include elevated general PFM tone, changes in viscoelastic properties, and at least in some women, abnormal increases in electrogenic activity.
There is a growing body of evidence to support the involvement of PFM hypertonicity in the pathophysiology of PVD. Limitations of the instruments as well as their properties should be considered when evaluating PFM tone in order to obtain better insight into which component of PFM tone is assessed. Future research is required for further investigating the underlying mechanisms of PFM hypertonicity, and studying the specific effects of physiotherapeutic interventions on PFM tone in women with PVD.
盆底肌(PFM)功能障碍,尤其是张力升高,被认为在激发性前庭疼痛(PVD)的病理生理学中起重要作用。然而,由于肌张力评估复杂,且需要深入了解与当前PFM评估工具的特点和局限性相关的肌肉生理学,盆底肌的参与情况仍未得到充分理解。本综述的目的是描述正常神经支配肌肉中肌张力涉及的结构和机制,并将这些概念与PVD女性的PFM研究结果进行讨论和关联。
对通过电子数据库检索和手工检索获得的文献进行叙述性综述。
正常神经支配肌肉的肌张力包括主动(收缩性)和被动(粘弹性)成分。目前评估PFM张力的方法,如数字触诊、超声成像、会阴压力测量、测力计测量和肌电图,可能评估的是不同成分。提示PVD女性存在PFM张力亢进的研究结果包括PFM总体张力升高、粘弹性特性改变,以及至少在部分女性中存在电活动异常增加。
越来越多的证据支持PFM张力亢进参与PVD的病理生理学过程。在评估PFM张力时,应考虑仪器的局限性及其特性,以便更好地了解所评估的是PFM张力的哪个成分。未来需要进一步研究PFM张力亢进的潜在机制,并研究物理治疗干预对PVD女性PFM张力的具体影响。