Ó Ciardha Caoilte, Tyler Nichola, Gannon Theresa A
a Centre of Research and Education in Forensic Psychology, School of Psychology, Keynes College , University of Kent , Canterbury.
Psychiatry. 2015;78(4):293-304. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2015.1061310.
Practitioners working with offenders who have set fires have access to very few measures examining fire-specific treatment needs (e.g., fire interest, fire attitudes). In this article we examine the new Four Factor Fire Scales (Ó Ciardha et al., 2015), which may be used by practitioners to examine fire-specific treatment needs for offenders who have set deliberate fires. We present a standardized scoring procedure when using these scales, as well as an associated scoring template for practitioner use.
Norm data are based on male and female firesetters (n = 378) and nonfiresetters (n = 187) recruited from 19 prison establishments (including six female establishments, one young offender institution) and 12 secure mixed-gender mental health settings.
We present a full overview of all data we have collected to date relating to the Four Factor Fire Scales across prison, mental health, and young offending participants. For each population, we present mean scores as well as associated cutoff scores and reliable change indices to aid practitioners in their interpretation of scores.
The Four Factor Fire Scales provide professionals working in the area with a robust template for administering, scoring, and interpreting the fire-specific factors currently identified as playing a role in deliberate firesetting behavior. Strengths and limitations of the measure are discussed.
与纵火罪犯打交道的从业者几乎没有可用的措施来评估特定于火灾的治疗需求(例如,对火灾的兴趣、对火灾的态度)。在本文中,我们研究了新的四因素火灾量表(Ó Ciardha等人,2015年),从业者可使用该量表来评估故意纵火罪犯的特定于火灾的治疗需求。我们介绍了使用这些量表时的标准化评分程序,以及供从业者使用的相关评分模板。
常模数据基于从19个监狱机构(包括6个女性机构、1个青少年罪犯机构)和12个安全的男女混合心理健康机构招募的男性和女性纵火者(n = 378)以及非纵火者(n = 187)。
我们全面概述了迄今为止我们收集到的与监狱、心理健康和青少年犯罪参与者的四因素火灾量表相关的所有数据。对于每个人群,我们给出了平均分数以及相关的临界分数和可靠变化指数,以帮助从业者解释分数。
四因素火灾量表为该领域的专业人员提供了一个强大的模板,用于管理、评分和解释目前确定在故意纵火行为中起作用的特定于火灾的因素。讨论了该测量方法的优点和局限性。