Editors' Overview: Experiments, Ethics, and New Technologies.
作者信息
Doorn Neelke, Spruit Shannon, Robaey Zoë
机构信息
Department of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5015, 2600 GA, Delft, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):607-11. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9748-8. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Editors' Overview: Experiments, Ethics, and New Technologies.编辑概述：实验、伦理与新技术
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):607-11. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9748-8. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
2
Whatever Happened to Human Experimentation?人体实验怎么了？
Hastings Cent Rep. 2016 Jan-Feb;46(1):8-11. doi: 10.1002/hast.531. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
3
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.世界医学协会《赫尔辛基宣言》。涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则。
Nurs Ethics. 2002 Jan;9(1):105-9. doi: 10.1191/0969733002ne486xx.
4
The participation of children in nontherapeutic diabetes research in the US.美国儿童参与非治疗性糖尿病研究的情况。
Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007 May;3(5):378-9. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0501.
5
Ethical and legal issues in enhancement research on human subjects.人类受试者增强研究中的伦理与法律问题。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Jan;20(1):30-45. doi: 10.1017/S0963180110000605.
6
Historical vulnerability and special scrutiny: precautions against discrimination in medical research.历史上的脆弱性与特别审查：医学研究中防止歧视的预防措施
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Summer;4(3):56-7; discussion W32. doi: 10.1080/15265160490497353.
7
The risks of reducing consciousness to neuroimaging.将意识简化为神经影像学的风险。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Sep;8(9):25-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160802412544.
8
Human subjects in weapons research.武器研究中的人类受试者。
Science. 2002 Nov 1;298(5595):923. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5595.923.
9
Protecting subjects who cannot give consent: toward a better standard for "minimal" risks.保护无法给予知情同意的受试者：迈向“最小”风险的更好标准。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 Sep-Oct;35(5):37-43.
10
Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjects.青少年作为双重易受伤害的研究对象。
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Winter;4(1):50-2. doi: 10.1162/152651604773067406.
引用本文的文献
1
Wastewater research and surveillance: an ethical exploration.废水研究与监测：伦理探索
Environ Sci (Camb). 2022 Sep 5;8(11):2431-2438. doi: 10.1039/d2ew00127f. eCollection 2022 Oct 27.
2
The Food Warden: An Exploration of Issues in Distributing Responsibilities for Safe-by-Design Synthetic Biology Applications.食品监管员：设计安全的合成生物学应用分配责任问题的探讨。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Dec;24(6):1673-1696. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9969-0. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
本文引用的文献
1
The Need for Governance by Experimentation: The Case of Biofuels.通过实验进行治理的必要性：生物燃料案例
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):815-30. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9729-y. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
2
Gone with the Wind: Conceiving of Moral Responsibility in the Case of GMO Contamination.《随风而逝：转基因生物污染案例中的道德责任构想》
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):889-906. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9744-z. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
3
An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology.评估实验技术的伦理框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):667-86. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9724-3. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
4
Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize.仅仅是机器上的一个齿轮？纳米技术中研究人员的个人责任是实现集体化的义务。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):871-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9718-1. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
5
Reversible Experiments: Putting Geological Disposal to the Test.可逆实验：对地质处置进行测试
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):707-33. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9697-2. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
6
Facing up to Complexity: Implications for Our Social Experiments.直面复杂性：对我们社会实验的启示。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):775-814. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9657-x. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
7
Creating Inquiry Between Technology Developers and Civil Society Actors: Learning from Experiences Around Nanotechnology.在技术开发者与民间社会行为者之间建立探究机制：借鉴纳米技术相关经验
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):907-22. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9660-2. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
Stretching the Traditional Notion of Experiment in Computing: Explorative Experiments.拓展计算领域中传统的实验概念：探索性实验。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):647-65. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9655-z. Epub 2015 May 28.
9
What is Proof of Concept Research and how does it Generate Epistemic and Ethical Categories for Future Scientific Practice?什么是概念验证研究，它如何为未来的科学实践生成认知和伦理范畴？
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):735-53. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9654-0. Epub 2015 May 26.
10
Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste: A Long-Term Socio-Technical Experiment.放射性废物的地质处置：一项长期的社会技术试验。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):687-705. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9650-4. Epub 2015 May 17.
Zotero 插件