Suppr超能文献

IOTA简单描述符及附件包块分类简单规则的外部验证

External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.

作者信息

Alcázar J L, Pascual M A, Graupera B, Aubá M, Errasti T, Olartecoechea B, Ruiz-Zambrana A, Hereter L, Ajossa S, Guerriero S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Dexeus, University Autonoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):397-402. doi: 10.1002/uog.15854.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic performance of a three-step strategy proposed by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study, performed at two tertiary-care university hospitals, of women diagnosed with an adnexal mass on transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound between December 2012 and December 2014. Women were scheduled for an ultrasound evaluation, which was initially performed by non-expert examiners. The examiner had to classify the mass using 'simple descriptors' (first step) and, if not possible, using 'simple rules' (second step). For inconclusive masses, an expert examiner classified the mass according to their subjective impression (third step). Masses were managed expectantly, with serial follow-up examinations, or surgically, according to ultrasound findings and clinical symptoms. Histology was used as the reference standard. Masses that were managed expectantly with at least 1 year of follow-up were considered as benign for analytical purposes. Women with less than 1 year of follow-up were not included in the study.

RESULTS

Six hundred and sixty-six women were included (median age, 41 (range, 18-81) years) of whom 514 were premenopausal and 152 were postmenopausal. Based on the three-step strategy, 362 women had surgical removal of the mass (53 malignant and 309 benign), 71 masses resolved spontaneously and 233 persisted. Four hundred and forty-eight (67.3%) of 666 masses could be classified using simple descriptors and, of the 218 that could not, 147 (67.4%) were classified using simple rules. Of the remaining 71 masses, the expert examiner classified 45 as benign, 12 as malignant and 14 as uncertain. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of the three-step strategy were 94.3%, 94.9%, 18.6 and 0.06, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The IOTA three-step strategy, based on the sequential use of simple descriptors, simple rules and expert evaluation, performs well for classifying adnexal masses as benign or malignant. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

评估国际卵巢肿瘤分析(IOTA)小组提出的三步策略对鉴别附件包块良恶性的诊断效能。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,在两家三级大学医院进行,研究对象为2012年12月至2014年12月间经阴道或经腹超声诊断为附件包块的女性。这些女性被安排进行超声评估,最初由非专业检查人员进行。检查人员必须使用“简单描述符”(第一步)对包块进行分类,若无法分类,则使用“简单规则”(第二步)。对于诊断不明确的包块,由专家检查人员根据主观印象进行分类(第三步)。根据超声检查结果和临床症状,对包块进行定期随访观察或手术治疗。组织学检查作为参考标准。为分析目的,将至少随访1年的定期随访观察的包块视为良性。随访时间不足1年的女性不纳入本研究。

结果

共纳入666名女性(中位年龄41岁(范围18 - 81岁)),其中514名处于绝经前,152名处于绝经后。基于三步策略,362名女性接受了包块手术切除(53例为恶性,309例为良性),71个包块自发消退,233个包块持续存在。666个包块中有448个(67.3%)可使用简单描述符分类,在无法分类的218个包块中,147个(67.4%)使用简单规则进行了分类。在其余71个包块中,专家检查人员将45个分类为良性,12个分类为恶性,14个分类为不确定。三步策略的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为94.3%、94.9%、18.6和0.06。

结论

基于依次使用简单描述符、简单规则和专家评估的IOTA三步策略,在将附件包块分类为良性或恶性方面表现良好。版权所有© 2016国际妇产科超声学会。由约翰·威利父子有限公司出版。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验