Gareeballah Awadia, Gameraddin Moawia, Alshoabi Sultan Abdulwadoud, Alsaedi Amirah, Elzaki Maisa, Alsharif Walaa, Daoud Ibrahim Mohamed, Aldahery Shrooq, Alelyani Magbool, AbdElrahim Elrashed, Alhazmi Fahad H, Hamd Zuhal Y, Ahmed Abouraida Raga, Khandaker Mayeen Uddin, Adam Mohamed
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia.
Faculty of Radiological Sciences and Medical Imaging, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 20;14:1474930. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1474930. eCollection 2024.
Adnexal masses are a common health issue in gynecology; the challenge lies in the differential diagnosis of these masses. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules (IOTA-SR) offers the first scoring system to aid in diagnosis. It is based on a set of five ultrasound imaging features indicative of a malignant ovarian tumor and five features indicative of a benign tumor. This review aims to assess the diagnostic performance of IOTA-SR for classifying ovarian tumors as benign or malignant.
A systematic review was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. The terminologies "IOTA-SR", "adnexal, mass", and "ovarian tumors scoring" were employed. Twenty-seven research articles conducted from 2008 to 2022 were included in the meta-analysis; the publication outcome indicates that performance quality tests were extracted directly or indirectly, including true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), and false negative (FN). The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the study quality and estimate the risk of bias. After estimating the pooled effect of the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was estimated using the bivariate random effects model. Utilizing Cochran's Q statistics and Higgins's inconsistency test through the I index for pooled analysis, the heterogeneity of studies was quantitatively evaluated. The funnel plot and Egger's test were utilized to visually and quantitatively evaluate potential publication bias.
Among 27 studies, including 7,841 adnexal masses, the results of this meta-analysis showed excellent diagnostic performance with a pooled sensitivity of 92% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89-0.94] and a pooled specificity of 92% (95% CI, 0.89-0.94). The IOTA-SR was applicable in 85.7% of adnexal masses.
The IOTA-SR is highly effective in the presurgical differentiation of malignant versus benign adnexal masses when applied by an expert ultrasonography operator.
附件包块是妇科常见的健康问题;对这些包块进行鉴别诊断具有挑战性。国际卵巢肿瘤分析简单规则(IOTA-SR)提供了首个辅助诊断的评分系统。它基于一组提示恶性卵巢肿瘤的五个超声成像特征和一组提示良性肿瘤的五个特征。本综述旨在评估IOTA-SR对卵巢肿瘤进行良恶性分类的诊断性能。
对MEDLINE、Embase、谷歌学术、Scopus和科学网进行系统综述。使用了术语“IOTA-SR”、“附件包块”和“卵巢肿瘤评分”。2008年至2022年进行的27篇研究文章纳入荟萃分析;发表结果表明直接或间接提取了性能质量测试数据,包括真阳性(TP)、假阳性(FP)、真阴性(TN)和假阴性(FN)。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2(QUADAS-2)来评估研究质量并估计偏倚风险。在估计敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比(DOR)的合并效应后,使用双变量随机效应模型估计汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。通过用于汇总分析的I指数,利用 Cochr an Q统计量和Higgins不一致性检验对研究的异质性进行定量评估。使用漏斗图和Egger检验对潜在的发表偏倚进行视觉和定量评估。
在27项研究中,包括7841例附件包块,该荟萃分析结果显示诊断性能优异,汇总敏感性为92%[95%置信区间(CI),0.89 - 0.94],汇总特异性为92%(95%CI,0.89 - 0.94)。IOTA-SR适用于85.7%的附件包块。
当由专业超声检查操作员应用时,IOTA-SR在术前鉴别恶性与良性附件包块方面非常有效。