Suppr超能文献

抗阻训练中的乳酸阈值和通气阈值。

The lactate and ventilatory thresholds in resistance training.

作者信息

Maté-Muñoz José Luis, Domínguez Raúl, Lougedo Juan H, Garnacho-Castaño Manuel V

机构信息

Department of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, Madrid, Spain.

TecnoCampus, College of Health Sciences, University of Pompeu Fabra, Mataró-Maresme, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017 Sep;37(5):518-524. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12327. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to identify the lactate threshold (LT) and first ventilatory threshold (VT ) in a graded resistance half-squat test and determine whether both thresholds are produced at the same workload. A further goal was to compare the visual inspection and algorithm adjustment methods of detecting both thresholds during graded resistance exercise.

METHODS

Twenty-four young men completed two test sessions 48 h apart; (i) the one-repetition maximum (1RM) was determined, (ii) an incremental load test was performed to locate LT and VT . VT was calculated in three different ways based on pulmonary ventilation, the ventilatory equivalent of oxygen or the end-tidal oxygen pressure (as VT -VE, VT -VE·VO2-1 or VT -PetO respectively).

RESULTS

LT and VT were located at the same intensity of exercise during the incremental load test. Using the algorithm method, the LT and VT -VE were estimated at 24·8 ± 4·8% 1RM (50·6 ± 10·5 kg) and 23·7 ± 4·8% 1RM (48·4 ± 10·0 kg), respectively; the difference between the two values being non-significant (P = 0·127). In addition, positive correlation was observed between the two thresholds (r = 0·761; P<0·001; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0·864). The visual inspection and algorithm adjustment methods provided similar LT and VT values (r > 0·796; ICC > 0·885).

CONCLUSIONS

The LT and VT were readily located during the incremental load half-squat test at similar workloads using both the visual inspection and algorithm adjustment methods. Both thresholds served to define two physiological stages (I, II) corresponding to the zones described for endurance exercise. Thus, both LT and VT could be used to prescribe the same intensity of resistance half-squat exercise.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在递增阻力半蹲试验中的乳酸阈(LT)和第一通气阈(VT),并确定这两个阈值是否在相同的负荷下产生。另一个目标是比较在递增阻力运动中检测这两个阈值的视觉检查法和算法调整法。

方法

24名年轻男性在间隔48小时的情况下完成了两个测试环节;(i)测定一次重复最大值(1RM),(ii)进行递增负荷试验以确定LT和VT。VT根据肺通气、氧通气当量或呼气末氧分压以三种不同方式计算(分别为VT-VE、VT-VE·VO2-1或VT-PetO)。

结果

在递增负荷试验期间,LT和VT位于相同的运动强度。使用算法法,LT和VT-VE分别估计为24.8±4.8%1RM(50.6±10.5千克)和23.7±4.8%1RM(48.4±10.0千克);两者之间的差异无统计学意义(P=0.127)。此外,观察到两个阈值之间存在正相关(r=0.761;P<0.001;组内相关系数(ICC)为0.864)。视觉检查法和算法调整法提供了相似的LT和VT值(r>0.796;ICC>0.885)。

结论

在递增负荷半蹲试验期间,使用视觉检查法和算法调整法均可在相似的负荷下轻松确定LT和VT。这两个阈值都用于定义与耐力运动所描述区域相对应的两个生理阶段(I、II)。因此,LT和VT均可用于规定相同强度的阻力半蹲运动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验