Qi Qihua, Xiao Qiang, Deng Liang, Li Chen, Dong Xieping
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;29(10):1253-8.
To investigate the advantage and short- and medium-term effectivenesses of paramedian incision minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mini-TLIF) by comparing with open TLIF.
A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 54 patients with single segmental lumbar degenerative disease who accorded with the inclusion criteria between January 2012 and March 2014. Open TLIF was performed in 26 patients (open group), mini-TLIF in 28 cases (minimally invasive group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, etiology, and affected segments between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The indexes of surgical trauma, systemic inflammatory response, clinical outcome, and interbody fusion rate were compared between 2 groups.
Dural rupture occurred in 1 case of open group, L5 nerve root injury in 1 case of minimally invasive group. All patients obtained primary healing of incision. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage of minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those of open group (P < 0.05). C-reactive protein, leucocyte count, and creatine kinase-MM (CK-MM) of open group were significantly higher than those of minimally invasive group at 24 hours after operation (P < 0.05). At 7 days after operation, the CK-MM of minimally invasive group was significantly lower than that of open group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in C-reactive protein and leucocyte count between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The follow-up time was 1.2-3.1 years in open group and 1.4-2.9 years in minimally invasive group. At 1 year after operation, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were significantly improved in 2 groups (P < 0.05). Minimally invasive group was better than open group in ODI and VAS score of back pain (P < 0.05), but VAS score of leg pain showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). According to the Suk interbody fusion standard, solid fusion was obtained in 18 cases, probable fusion in 4 cases, and nonunion in 4 cases, and the fusion rate was 84.61% in open group; solid fusion was obtained in 21 cases, probable fusion in 3 cases, and nonunion in 4 cases, and the fusion rate was 85.71% in minimally invasive group; and the interbody fusion rates showed no significant difference between 2 groups (Χ2 = 0.072, P = 0.821).
Compared with open TLIF, paramedian incision mini-TLIF has advantages of minimal surgical trauma and little blood loss for single-level lumbar degenerative disease. The short- and medium-term effectivenesses are satisfactory.
通过与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)对比,探讨旁正中切口微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(mini-TLIF)的优势及中短期疗效。
回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年3月符合纳入标准的54例单节段腰椎退变性疾病患者的临床资料。26例患者行开放TLIF(开放组),28例患者行mini-TLIF(微创组)。两组患者在性别、年龄、病程、病因及受累节段方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。比较两组手术创伤、全身炎症反应、临床疗效及椎间融合率指标。
开放组1例发生硬脊膜破裂,微创组1例发生L5神经根损伤。所有患者切口均一期愈合。微创组手术时间、术中出血量及术后引流量均明显低于开放组(P<0.05)。术后24小时开放组C反应蛋白、白细胞计数及肌酸激酶-MM(CK-MM)明显高于微创组(P<0.05)。术后7天,微创组CK-MM明显低于开放组(P<0.05),但两组C反应蛋白及白细胞计数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。开放组随访时间为1.2 - 3.1年,微创组随访时间为1.4 - 2.9年。术后1年,两组Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)及视觉模拟评分(VAS)均明显改善(P<0.05)。微创组在ODI及背痛VAS评分方面优于开放组(P<0.05),但腿痛VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。根据Suk椎间融合标准,开放组18例获得坚固融合,4例可能融合,4例未融合,融合率为84.61%;微创组21例获得坚固融合,3例可能融合,4例未融合,融合率为85.71%;两组椎间融合率差异无统计学意义(Χ2 = 0.072,P = 0.821)。
与开放TLIF相比,旁正中切口mini-TLIF治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病具有手术创伤小、出血少的优势,中短期疗效满意。