• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Clinical evaluation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for severe lumbar spinal stenosis].[微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的临床评估]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 15;33(7):801-806. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201903120.
2
[Short-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Meyerding degree Ⅰ or Ⅱ single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis].[单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗迈耶丁Ⅰ度或Ⅱ度单节段腰椎滑脱症的短期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 15;36(10):1207-1212. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202205126.
3
[Comparison of clinical effect and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及肌肉损伤影像学比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 May 25;36(5):420-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.05.005.
4
Ultrasonic bone curette-assisted unilateral approach for bilateral decompression with MIS-TLIF for severe lumbar spinal stenosis.超声骨刮匙辅助单侧入路双侧减压经皮微创腰椎椎间融合术治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 23;25(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07453-7.
5
[Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between two approaches in treatment of single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis].两种入路微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 15;33(7):807-813. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201903096.
6
Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 27;21(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03820-2.
7
[Comparison of effectiveness between percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].经皮同轴大通道内镜下腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 15;36(6):681-690. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202202076.
8
[The clinical results of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar instability].[微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并腰椎不稳的临床疗效]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Dec;49(12):1081-5.
9
Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的心理和功能比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun;13(4):1213-1226. doi: 10.1111/os.12986. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
[Prospective comparative study of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis].[单侧双孔通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗单节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症伴腰椎滑脱的前瞻性对比研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;38(5):521-528. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402058.

引用本文的文献

1
Fusion's Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF).经椎间孔椎体间融合术(TLIF)后融合物在固定节段内的位置及质量
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;11(21):2814. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212814.
2
Postoperative cage migration and subsidence following TLIF surgery is not associated with bony fusion.TLIF 手术后的椎间笼迁移和下沉与骨性融合无关。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;13(1):12597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38801-7.
3
Risk Factors in the Prediction of Leg Numbness after Spinal Endoscopic Surgery: Evaluation and Development of a Nomogram.脊柱内镜手术后腿部麻木的预测风险因素:列线图的评估与制定。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Nov 8;2022:9502749. doi: 10.1155/2022/9502749. eCollection 2022.
4
[Comparison of intervertebral height and lordosis of fusion segment between open- and minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions].[开放与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术融合节段椎间高度与前凸的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 15;34(4):422-427. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201910060.

本文引用的文献

1
[Short-term effectiveness of transforaminal unilateral approach for bilateral decompression in lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].经椎间孔单侧入路双侧减压在腰椎椎间融合治疗腰椎管狭窄症中的短期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 15;31(5):519-526. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201612131.
2
Minimally invasive procedure reduces adjacent segment degeneration and disease: New benefit-based global meta-analysis.微创手术可减少相邻节段退变和疾病:基于新益处的全球荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0171546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171546. eCollection 2017.
3
[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].[经旁正中切口微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;29(10):1253-8.
4
Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腰椎管狭窄症手术的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0122800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122800. eCollection 2015.
5
Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center.与微创经椎间孔腰椎融合术相关的围手术期并发症:单中心204例腰椎不稳手术的评估
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2078-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.016. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
6
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: evaluation and management.退变性腰椎管狭窄症:评估与管理。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Aug;20(8):527-35. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-08-527.
7
Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study.日本基于人群队列的症状性腰椎椎管狭窄症的患病率及其与身体机能表现的相关性:和歌山脊柱研究。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Oct;20(10):1103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
8
Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.微创或开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术作为既往行开放椎间盘切除术和腰椎减压术治疗的患者的翻修手术。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Apr;20(4):623-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1578-4. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
9
Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.基于磁共振图像硬膜囊形态的腰椎管狭窄严重程度的定性分级。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21):1919-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd.
10
Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.手术与非手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的 4 年结果:脊柱患者结局研究试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 15;35(14):1329-38. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d.

[微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的临床评估]

[Clinical evaluation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for severe lumbar spinal stenosis].

作者信息

Yuan Chao, Liu Chao, Shen Junhong, Tian Huake, Zheng Wenjie, Zhang Chao, Pan Yong, Huang Bo, Jiang Tao, Zhang Zhengfeng, Li Changqing, Wang Jian, Zhou Yue

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, P.R.China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037,

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 15;33(7):801-806. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201903120.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.201903120
PMID:31297995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8337423/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical results and complication prevention of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

METHODS

The clinical data of 112 patients with severe LSS treated with MIS-TLIF between January 2010 and January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 43 males and 69 females, aged 52-81 years, with an average age of 65.3 years. The disease duration ranged from 4 to 126 months, with an average of 10.5 months. Clinical manifestations: 104 cases of low back pain, 91 cases of nervous intermittent claudication of both lower limbs, 21 cases of unilateral nerve root pain and/or numbness, and 5 cases of cauda equina nerve injury. The 112 cases were all severe central spinal stenosis, including 32 cases with lateral recess stenosis, 20 cases with foramen stenosis, 9 cases with ossification of ligamentum flavum, 38 cases with disc herniation; 14 cases with two complications and 5 cases with three. Stenosis segment: L in 6 cases, L in 89 cases, and L , S in 17 cases. Surgical methods included bilateral decompression through bilateral approach (60 cases), bilateral decompression through unilateral approach (15 cases), and unilateral decompression (37 cases). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, fusion rate, and surgical complications were recorded. At last follow-up, the lumbar fusion was evaluated by Bridwell method, grades Ⅰ and Ⅱ were expressed as fusion.

RESULTS

The operation time was 83-186 minutes (mean, 126.8 minutes), and the intraoperative blood loss was 65-630 mL (mean, 163.1 mL). All the 112 patients were followed up 25-49 months, with an average of 35.1 months. The VAS score of low back pain and leg pain and ODI score at each time point after operation were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores ( <0.05). There was no significant difference between the VAS score of low back pain and leg pain and ODI score at the other time points except 1 month after operation ( <0.05). At last follow-up, 2 cases of cauda equina nerve injury recovered and 3 cases partially recovered. According to Bridwell classification criteria, 58 cases were grade Ⅰ, 47 cases were grade Ⅱ, and 7 cases were grade Ⅲ. The fusion rate was 93.8%. Perioperative complications included 5 cases of incision complications (superficial infection in 3 cases, hematoma formation in 2 cases), 19 cases of internal fixator complications (intraoperative end plate fracture in 8 cases, fusion cage sinking in 11 cases at last follow-up), and 15 cases of neurological complications (dural sac tear in 10 cases, transient neurological symptoms of lower extremities aggravated in 5 cases).

CONCLUSION

MIS-TLIF treatment of single-level severe LSS can achieve good clinical results, while there is a risk of serious complications. Full understanding of the clinical and imaging features of the disease and reasonable and careful operation are helpful to control the occurrence of cauda equina nerve damage.

摘要

目的

探讨微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗单节段重度腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的临床效果及并发症防治。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2017年1月采用MIS-TLIF治疗的112例重度LSS患者的临床资料。其中男性43例,女性69例,年龄52 - 81岁,平均年龄65.3岁。病程4 - 126个月,平均10.5个月。临床表现:腰痛104例,双下肢神经源性间歇性跛行91例,单侧神经根性疼痛和/或麻木21例,马尾神经损伤5例。112例均为重度中央型椎管狭窄,其中合并侧隐窝狭窄32例,椎间孔狭窄20例,黄韧带骨化9例,椎间盘突出38例;合并两种并发症14例,合并三种并发症5例。狭窄节段:L₄ 6例,L₅ 89例,L₅、S₁ 17例。手术方式包括双侧入路双侧减压60例,单侧入路双侧减压15例,单侧减压37例。记录手术时间、术中出血量、腰痛和腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、融合率及手术并发症。末次随访时,采用Bridwell法评估腰椎融合情况,Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级表示融合。

结果

手术时间83 - 186分钟(平均126.8分钟),术中出血量65 - 630毫升(平均163.1毫升)。112例患者均获随访25 - 49个月,平均35.1个月。术后各时间点腰痛和腿痛VAS评分及ODI评分与术前比较均显著改善(P < 0.05)。除术后1个月外,其他时间点腰痛和腿痛VAS评分及ODI评分差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。末次随访时,2例马尾神经损伤恢复,3例部分恢复。按Bridwell分级标准,Ⅰ级58例,Ⅱ级47例,Ⅲ级7例。融合率为93.8%。围手术期并发症包括切口并发症5例(浅表感染3例,血肿形成2例),内固定器并发症19例(术中终板骨折8例,末次随访时融合器下沉11例),神经并发症15例(硬脊膜撕裂10例,下肢短暂性神经症状加重5例)。

结论

MIS-TLIF治疗单节段重度LSS可取得良好临床效果,但存在严重并发症风险。充分了解疾病临床及影像学特点,合理细致操作有助于控制马尾神经损伤的发生。