Webber Sandra C, St John Philip D
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
J Aging Phys Act. 2016 Jul;24(3):451-8. doi: 10.1123/japa.2015-0234. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
Activity monitors may not accurately detect steps in hospitalized older adults who walk slowly. We compared ActiGraph GT3X+ step counts (hip and ankle locations, default and low frequency extension [LFE] analyses) to the StepWatch monitor (ankle) during a hallway walk in 38 geriatric rehabilitation patients (83.2 ± 7.1 years of age, 0.4 ± 0.2 m/s gait speed). Absolute percent error values were low (<3%) and did not differ for the StepWatch and the GT3X+ (ankle, LFE); however, error values were high (19-97%) when the GT3X+ was worn at the hip and/ or analyzed with the default filter. Although these finding suggest the GT3X+ (ankle, LFE) functions as well as the StepWatch in detecting steps during walking in older adults with slow gait speeds, further research is needed to determine whether the GT3X+ is also able to disregard other body movements (e.g., fidgeting) that occur when full day monitoring is utilized.
活动监测器可能无法准确检测出走路缓慢的住院老年人的步数。我们在38名老年康复患者(年龄83.2±7.1岁,步态速度0.4±0.2米/秒)在走廊行走期间,将ActiGraph GT3X+计步器(髋部和脚踝位置,默认和低频扩展[LFE]分析)与StepWatch监测器(脚踝)进行了比较。绝对百分比误差值较低(<3%),且StepWatch和GT3X+(脚踝,LFE)之间无差异;然而,当GT3X+佩戴在髋部和/或使用默认滤波器进行分析时,误差值较高(19-97%)。尽管这些发现表明,在检测步态速度缓慢的老年人行走步数方面,GT3X+(脚踝,LFE)与StepWatch的功能相当,但仍需要进一步研究以确定GT3X+在进行全天监测时是否也能够忽略其他身体动作(例如坐立不安)。